Connect with us


Dems Push Biden to Fix the Broken Immigration System and End Title 42

Dems Push Biden to Fix the Broken Immagration System and End Title 42

Pres. Joe Biden’s administration is currently facing pressure from both the Democratic and Republican parties with regard to its decision to lift Title 42. As this goes on, the White House calls for a solution to the country’s “broken immigration system.”

This month, the current administration revealed that it will lift Title 42, a policy that has been used since March 2020, on May 23. Ever since it has been enforced, the said rule was sued to quickly expel a majority of migrants from the southern border.

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said on Monday that it is vital to remember that the said rule “is not an immigration authority” or “an immigration plan.”

Psaki said: “There is no question we have a broken immigration system. There’s more we need to do. We’ve been saying that from the first day the president took office, and anyone who wants to work on that, Democrats, Republicans, anyone, how we can put smarter security in place, how we can have an asylum processing system that works, we would love to do that.”

According to a White House official, as reported by Fox News, with Title 42, “a significant percentage of migrants have re-attempted to enter the United States illegally following their rapid expulsions because they were not placed in immigration proceedings, not processed through our system, and ultimately faced no consequences for attempting to re-enter the country illegally.”

The White House used February statistics as their basis, saying that during that month, with the Title 42 order in effect, over 90,000 people were expelled for trying to cross into the United States. It also said that these individuals had “no legal barrier to trying again and again.”

“Once Title 42 is lifted—on May 23rd—if these people come to the border, they have no legal basis to remain, they will be removed, and if they try again, they will be committing a crime,” the White House official also told Fox News.

The official also said while looking beyond the rule’s lofting that the administration aims to process migrants “in a safe and orderly manner,” while closely coordinating with communities at the border, and “in accordance with the laws of the United States.”

The official then mentioned that this includes “expeditiously removing those who do not qualify to remain in the United States.”

“So, let me be clear — individuals who cross the border without legal authorization will be promptly placed into removal proceedings and, if unable to establish a legal basis to remain in the United States, will be expeditiously removed, and returned to their country of origin,” the officialalso stated. went on to say.

The said official also mentioned that the White House believes that asylum and other legal pathways “should remain available to those seeking protections,” and reiterated that the Biden administration is “working to expand legal pathways” so that people don’t make the “treacherous journey” to the border.

“But those not seeking protection, or who don’t qualify, will be promptly removed to their countries of origin,” the official added.

The official then mentioned that the end of Titel 42’s implementation “is a return” to the “standard,” and that people not seeking protection who also don’t qualify will be “promptly removed to their countries of origin,” and face “other long-term immigration consequences.”

In March, over 220,000 migrant encounters were recorded, 50% of which were expelled due to Title 42, as per the Customs and Border Protection data published last week. The said figure, the highest during the current administration so far, is expected to go up in the next few months, specifically if the lifting of Title 42 pushes through.

The Department of Homeland Security has mentioned that it’s been preparing for the possibility of having 18,000 encounters a day.

Members of the Republican party have criticized the Biden administration for its plan to end the implementation of the rule for months. Meanwhile, more and more Democrats have been stepping up and opposing the decision, saying that the country needs a plan in place.

Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) have signed a legislation that would extend Title 42’s implementation by 60 days. The said legislation would also require DHS create a plan in dealing with the likely post-Title 42 influx.

These Democratic lawmakers have all discussed the bill before. Manhchin called the lifting of the policy “frightening.” Earlier this month, Tester stated that he is “strongly opposed” to the administration’s decision. Meanwhile, Hassan mentioned that lifting the order “will likely lead to a migrant surge that the administration does not appear to be ready for.”

“I warned the administration about this months and months ago, and they still don’t have an adequate plan,” Kelly said last week to Fox News Digital. “They say they are working on it. My guess is that we’ll get to May 23, there probably is not going to be an adequate plan in place and, if that’s the case, I don’t think we should lift Title 42.”

Additionally, Florida Democratic Rep. Val Demings’ spokesperson spoke to Politico on Monday and stated that “Until there is a plan to put more boots on the ground and support our law enforcement officers at the border, Chief Demings does not support lifting Title 42.”

Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., also asked for a delay on Monday.

“Unless we have a well-thought-out plan, I think it is something that should be revisited and perhaps delayed. I’m going to defer judgment on that until I give the administration the opportunity to fully articulate what that plan is. But I share … concerns of some of my colleagues,” he said to a group of reporters, according to the Hill.

On the other hand, Senate Republicans have been trying to stop the administration from getting rid of Title 42 in the fist place, and they are using a COVID-19 funding bill to do so. They already managed to delay the consideration of the compromise legislation worth $10 billion.

Additionally, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his deputies stated that they will keep up the COVID-19 funds’ filibuster until Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) allows them to vote on the amendment that would keep the said policy in place.

“What is happening right now is they’re essentially holding hostage funding for COVID. And we are going to run out of funding,” Psaki said in connection to the stakes of the standoff.

“We are already running out of funding for key programs. So our issue here is let’s move forward with the COVID funding,” she also went to say. “We’re happy to have a discussion about the broken immigration system. We agree it’s broken. Let’s work together on addressing that.”

Continue Reading


Former Democrat Tops NH Trump VP Poll


In an electrifying and unexpected development, a new poll from the University of New Hampshire Survey Center reveals that former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii tops the list of preferred running mates for former President Donald Trump. This strategic choice underscores Trump’s commitment to broadening his appeal and strengthening his base with an unconventional but highly effective candidate.

Tulsi Gabbard, who initially ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, courageously left her party two years later to become an independent. Now, she emerges as the favorite among nearly a quarter (24%) of New Hampshire voters who are not supporting President Biden. Gabbard’s ability to connect with a diverse electorate and her staunch opposition to the far-left agenda make her a powerful ally for Trump.

Gabbard’s support stands seven points ahead of biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, indicating a strong preference for Gabbard’s unique blend of political independence and principled leadership. This shows that voters are looking for leaders who are willing to stand up against the establishment and fight for American values.

Ramaswamy, along with other notable figures like Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, have endorsed Trump, yet Gabbard’s lead suggests a deeper resonance with voters seeking a fresh and unifying voice. Her conservative principles, military background, and dedication to freedom and the Constitution make her an ideal running mate for Trump.

Trump’s consideration of Gabbard is a testament to his strategic thinking and commitment to broadening his appeal. Gabbard, a veteran of the Iraq War and an officer in the Hawaii National Guard, brings a wealth of experience and a compelling personal story as the first Samoan-American elected to Congress. Her transition from a progressive Democrat to an independent has been marked by her steadfast dedication to fundamental freedoms, resonating with many conservatives who feel disenfranchised by the current political climate.

In a Fox News town hall in February, Trump hinted that Gabbard was on his short list for running mates. Her praise for Trump, acknowledging his resilience and willingness to fight against the Washington establishment, underscores a shared commitment to challenging the status quo and defending American values against the encroachment of socialism and government overreach.

Gabbard’s familiarity with New Hampshire, a crucial swing state, adds another layer of strategic advantage. Her presence in the state during her 2020 presidential run and her support for Republican candidates in 2022 have cemented her popularity among voters who are tired of the same old politics and crave genuine change.

By considering Gabbard as a running mate, Trump demonstrates his ability to think outside traditional party lines and appeal to a broader coalition. This bold move could be the key to uniting the nation behind his campaign, bringing together a diverse group of voters eager for a leader who prioritizes American values and freedoms.

As the 2024 election approaches, the prospect of a Trump-Gabbard ticket promises an exciting and dynamic campaign. This powerful combination of leadership, experience, and dedication to conservative principles is poised to capture the imagination and support of Americans from all walks of life, ensuring a strong and united front against the progressive agenda threatening our nation’s future.


POLL: Would you support Tulsi Gabbard for VP?


Continue Reading


Rubio Comes Out For Mass Deportations


In a powerful and assertive appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) voiced strong support for former President Donald Trump’s commitment to mass deportation, calling for dramatic action to address the escalating illegal immigration crisis. Rubio’s remarks come at a critical juncture as many conservatives believe the unchecked influx of illegal immigrants threatens the very fabric of American society.

Responding to host Kristen Welker’s query about Trump’s proposed migrant detention camps and plans for deporting over 11 million undocumented immigrants, Rubio underscored the necessity of such measures, stating that the actual numbers have surged far beyond past estimates. “Eleven million, that was the number ten years ago. We’re talking upwards of 25 to 30 million,” Rubio declared, highlighting the severe underestimation of the crisis by prior administrations and the urgent need to address the reality on the ground.

“The answer to your question is yes,” Rubio affirmed. “We cannot absorb 25, 30 million people who entered this country illegally. What country on earth would tolerate that? We don’t even know who most of these people are.” Rubio’s remarks underscore the critical importance of national security and the impracticality of vetting individuals from nations with unreliable documentation systems. He pointed out that many of these individuals are coming from countries where there is no reliable way to ascertain their backgrounds, posing significant risks to the safety and security of American citizens.

Rubio continued, “Unfortunately, we’ll have to do something dramatic to remove people from this country that are here illegally, especially people we know nothing about. Ten million, 11 million was the number 15 years ago. Today, it’s upwards of 25, 30 million, maybe more.” This stark depiction of the situation reflects a deep frustration with the federal government’s failure to enforce immigration laws and protect the nation’s borders.

The Senator’s call for action is a rallying cry for those who view the current situation not as mere immigration but as a “mass migration” and “invasion.” “This is not immigration. You asked me about immigration. This is mass migration, mass migration. This an invasion of the country, and it needs to be dealt with dramatically,” Rubio asserted. His use of such strong language underscores the urgency and gravity with which he and his supporters view the issue.

From a conservative perspective, the influx of illegal immigrants represents not only a breach of national sovereignty but also a direct threat to the economic and social stability of the country. Many argue that illegal immigrants take jobs away from American citizens, drain public resources, and increase crime rates. Rubio’s stance resonates with a significant portion of the American electorate who are increasingly alarmed by these impacts.

Rubio’s statements also reflect a broader conservative sentiment that the U.S. must regain control of its borders to preserve the nation’s identity and values. The proposed mass deportation plan represents a dramatic shift towards stricter enforcement policies that prioritize the sovereignty and safety of American citizens above all else. Rubio and his supporters argue that the rule of law must be restored and that illegal immigrants must face the consequences of their actions.

Rubio’s supporters herald him as a bold and necessary voice in the Senate, willing to tackle one of America’s most pressing issues head-on. They praise his unwavering commitment to securing the borders and protecting American jobs and resources from the strain of illegal immigration. Many conservatives view Rubio as a champion of the rule of law and a defender of American sovereignty, seeing his strong stance on immigration as essential to the nation’s future.

With the 2024 elections approaching, Rubio’s staunch stance on immigration is likely to play a pivotal role in shaping the Republican platform. His alignment with Trump’s hardline policies signals a continued commitment to addressing what many conservatives view as one of the most pressing challenges facing the nation today. As the debate over immigration heats up, Rubio’s call for dramatic action will undoubtedly galvanize those who believe that the time for half-measures and leniency has long passed. The future of America, they argue, depends on decisive and unwavering action to secure its borders and uphold the rule of law.

Rubio’s clear and uncompromising position on illegal immigration is a beacon of hope for many who feel that their concerns have been ignored for too long. His advocacy for mass deportation and stringent border control measures reassures his base that he is committed to protecting the American way of life. As the nation prepares for the 2024 elections, Rubio’s vision for a secure and sovereign America will likely inspire and mobilize voters who demand robust action against the illegal immigration crisis.


POLL: Would you support Marco Rubio for VP?


Continue Reading


Radical Dems Go to Bat for Traitor Johnson Over Ukraine


In a recent appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) sparked controversy with his unexpected declaration of support for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), despite glaring ideological disparities. Khanna’s surprising endorsement emerged in the aftermath of Speaker Johnson’s contentious facilitation of a foreign aid package, which included provisions for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, and passed through Congress under his guidance.

During his conversation with host Jonathan Karl, Khanna’s remarks seemed to laud Speaker Johnson’s leadership, citing vague notions of civility and procedural fairness. However, this endorsement from a Democratic representative inevitably raises doubts about Speaker Johnson’s commitment to conservative principles and his integrity as a leader within the conservative movement.

Conservative circles have traditionally approached issues of foreign aid with caution, particularly when it involves nations like Ukraine, and have advocated for a policy of non-interventionism. Speaker Johnson’s forceful promotion of such a package, seemingly at odds with these foundational conservative beliefs, inevitably begs the question of his fidelity to the conservative cause and his willingness to compromise on core values for political expediency.

Khanna’s unexpected alignment with Speaker Johnson exposes a troubling trend within conservative leadership, where the steadfast commitment to conservative principles is often sacrificed in pursuit of personal ambition and political pragmatism. By throwing his support behind Speaker Johnson, Khanna inadvertently highlights the erosion of conservative values within the movement and the growing influence of moderate voices willing to dilute conservative principles for the sake of compromise.

As the debate over Speaker Johnson’s future continues, Khanna’s endorsement serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges facing the conservative movement, torn between its ideological roots and the allure of centrist compromise. Whether Speaker Johnson’s actions will have lasting repercussions for conservative leadership remains uncertain, but Khanna’s endorsement has undoubtedly reignited a fierce debate over the movement’s identity and its commitment to upholding conservative values amidst internal discord and external pressures.



POLL: Is Speaker Mike Johnson a traitor to America?


Continue Reading