Connect with us


(WATCH) Anheuser-Busch Releases New Beer Ad, CEO Issues Statement

(WATCH) Anheuser-Busch Releases New Beer Ad, CEO Issues Statement

(ConcernedPatriot) – Brendan Whitworth, the CEO of Anheuser-Busch, released a statement on Friday about the company’s association with Dylan Mulvaney, a once-gay man who now identifies as a woman.

The radical left’s efforts to spread woke gender ideology into society by putting it at the forefront of famous brands in corporate America generated anger nationwide due to the company’s decision to focus on these concerns.

Anheuser-Busch reportedly saw its market value decline by over $6 billion as tensions increased and boycotts spread.

Whitworth said it “never wanted to be part of a topic that divides people” on Friday.

Whitworth added,

“I am accountable for making sure every consumer feels proud of the beer we make as the CEO of a company founded in America’s heartland more than 165 years ago.”

He continued: “Before making a meek mea culpa.”

“We’re honored to be part of the fabric of this country. Anheuser-Busch employs more than 18,000 people and our independent distributors employ an additional 47,000 valued colleagues. We have thousands of partners, millions of fans and a proud history supporting our communities, military, first responders, sports fans, and hard-working Americans everywhere.”

“We never intended to participate in a debate that separates people.”

Whitworth added,

“We are in the business of bringing people together over a beer. My experience serving this nation taught me the value of accountability and the principles upon which America was founded: freedom, hard labor, and respect for one another.”

He stated, “As CEO of Anheuser-Busch, I am committed to strengthening and safeguarding our exceptional history and tradition, emphasizing my dedication to the nation, business, brands, and partners.”

He remarked, “I travel around America a lot, listening to and learning from our distributors, customers, and others. “Going future, I’ll keep working relentlessly to offer fantastic beers to customers all around our country.”

But there was no apology, and instead released this video, trying to make up for how they treated their loyal brand followers:

The announcement follows a March 23 podcast interview with Alissa Heinerscheid, vice president of marketing for Bud Light.

The marketing executive spoke out against the brand’s reputation on the Make Yourself at Home podcast, saying she wanted to “change the tone” and make it “really inclusive… lighter and brighter and different and [appealing to women and to men].”

She lamented the brand’s former reputation as “fratty” with “sort of out-of-touch comedy,” saying that representation is at the core of evolution.

The “New” Bud Light Demographic (explicit language)

Some prominent conservative figures blasted the business for honoring the transgender celebrity with a limited-edition can.

In a contentious April 1 post announcing the partnership, Mulvaney stated, “This month I celebrated my day 365 of womanhood and Bud Light sent me arguably the nicest gift ever – a can with my face on it”:

Donald Trump Jr. Defends Bud Light

On a Triggered podcast, Donald Trump Jr. said, “We’ve all seen the blowback that Budweiser is getting over the trans marketing gimmick.”

He said that other companies, like Nike, also participate in the woke movement and even employ Mulvaney, a biological guy, to market sports bras. “People are upset, and rightfully so,” he added.

“American business icon Anheuser-Busch. Inquiring as to whether the action was a “one-off enormous screwup” or “something greater,” Don Jr. stated, “This is Budweiser, you know, with the Clydesdales with the football and bald eagles.”

He continued by saying that after doing some research, he and his colleagues found that Anheuser-Busch backs Republicans:

“This could be just the act of one rogue woke lunatic in a marketing department filled with leftist staffers. The Daily Wire is now reporting that no one at the senior level of Anheuser-Busch was aware of the partnership with Dylan Mulvaney. That makes sense, and I saw a little bit about that. Charlie Kirk was talking about it.”

“In a modern corporate America, Anheuser-Busch backed Republicans in the previous election. He noted that those percentages are “actually almost unheard of in corporate America, where it’s so easy to go woke, where they do so often.”

“Their employees and their PAC gave around 60% to Republicans and 40% to Democrats.”

Don Jr. added that Anheuser-Busch “spent big” for Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and is concentrating on trade and tax legislation.

He said this made their most recent action seem even more out of character because “they haven’t done any pushing for like the odd pet concerns of the day and the bullshit.”

Don Jr. placed them “on notice” after making the point that the corporation appears to be among the most conservative-leaning in the nation.

Charlie Kirk discussed this subject on an episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, saying he anticipates “odd and crazy” behavior from businesses like Coca-Cola and Nike.

He explained that Anheuser-Busch gave “almost a half-million dollars” to promote J.D. Vance and spent hundreds of thousands to “attempt to fire Nancy Pelosi”: “We viewed of this brand as something that was meant to be protected, as something that was off bounds.”

Ultimately, Kirk hypothesized that the company’s contentious campaign hurt so many Americans because it avoids engaging in politics, at least publicly.

“They appear to want to avoid politics at all costs. This was problematic because of that. Some of the evidence suggests that this mistake was a one-time blunder.” Kirk continued, “hoping this would be a lesson learned and not happen again.”

Copyright 2023,




( – Joe Biden has decided not to run for reelection.

On Sunday afternoon, Biden declared his plan and promised to provide further details shortly.

“It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your President,” Biden’s statement read. “And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

Although Vice President Kamala Harris was expressly endorsed as his successor, he congratulated her in his statement for “being an extraordinary partner in all this work.”

But Biden later gave “my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year” in a statement uploaded on X.

Then, in a powerful message to Democrats, Biden urged them to unite and defeat Trump, emphasizing the importance of collective action in the upcoming election.

Do you believe VP Kamala Harris will be the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading


9 Secret Service Failures that Led to Trump Almost Being Assassinated

9 Secret Service Failures that Led to Trump Almost Being Assassinated

( – This past Saturday, during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump came dangerously close to being assassinated in what is believed to be the biggest Secret Service blunder in forty years.

The fact remains that the organization tasked with defending Trump was unable to prevent the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, from setting up shop less than 500 feet away, killing Corey Comperatore, a 50-year-old volunteer fire chief, and hitting President Trump in the ear.

Numerous investigations are in progress, but there have been few replies yet. Kimberly Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee on Monday.

The following nine significant security lapses by the Secret Service that we are now aware of require attention:

1. There was an apparent security concern from the rooftop from where Crooks fired shots at Trump. According to NBC News, the Secret Service had recognized the rooftop as a possible point of vulnerability in the days leading up to the rally.

Why was the building given to local law enforcement and not included in the Secret Service’s inside perimeter? Why wasn’t the building’s perimeter secured? How did rally participants see Crooks ascending to the rooftop and positioning himself before the police could stop him?

When did the Secret Service’s counter-sniper teams learn about him, and why weren’t any of them designated to keep an eye on the rooftop?

2. The Secret Service allowed local police enforcement to be housed inside the structure instead of outside on the roof. According to Cheatle, the choice was to house local law enforcement inside the structure instead of on top of it.

She asserted that the roof’s “slope” was a “safety factor” in the decision. Dan Bongino, a podcast presenter and former Secret Service agent, has dubbed that “bullsh-t.”

In his July 18, 2024, podcast episode, Bongino stated that he had heard from sources that local police snipers were placed inside because they were pitted against counter-snipers and thought they could accomplish the task from the building’s second story.

This raises the question: Why weren’t counter-snipers on the rooftop watching for would-be snipers?

3. The building’s exterior was not secure, which gave Crooks access to the rooftop. Who was guarding the building from the outside or the rooftop from below, even if local police snipers were not stationed on the rooftop?

Did local law enforcement officers have a watch duty at the building? The Washington Post stated that although the agency had planned ahead, local police had informed the Secret Service before Saturday that they did not have the means to place a patrol car and officer outside the facility.

Why didn’t the Secret Service devise a backup strategy? How did Crooks manage to go to the top unhindered and get a direct line of sight with Trump?

4. About three hours before Trump spoke, at around 3 p.m., local law police noticed Crooks near a magnetometer with a range finder. After that, they lost sight of him. Why hadn’t law enforcement or the Secret Service questioned or followed him earlier?

CNN reports that Crooks caused a stir when he passed past magnetometers erected to check participants for the presence of a range finder. This device resembles a tiny pair of binoculars and is frequently used by the military or hunters to locate targets.

According to Bongino, there is disagreement over whether he used magnetometers in real life. Nevertheless, he was supposedly seen close to them.

The questions are: Who saw Crooks using the range finder, and who was informed of the sighting? Why wasn’t he followed up with or questioned at that point?

5. Crooks was not stopped or questioned even though local law enforcement officers reportedly saw him about an hour before Trump was scheduled to speak.

They saw him hanging outside the building, scoping the rooftop, returning with a backpack, and pulling out a range finder. They reported him to a command center.

It is unclear to whom Crooks was reported, whether the Secret Service knew about him then, and why he was not apprehended or questioned in light of his suspicious activity.

How was he permitted to ascend onto the rooftop without being stopped if he was under the notice of the Secret Service or local law enforcement?

6. About 20 minutes before Trump entered the stage, at 5:52 p.m., the Secret Service allegedly saw Crooks on the rooftop. Despite this, the agency did not prevent Trump from taking the platform.

At 5:52 p.m., ABC News reported he was spotted on the rooftop by Secret Service snipers. Why was Trump permitted to speak on stage even though?

When a local police officer observed Crooks on the rooftop sometime around 6:02 p.m., it was said that he pointed his gun at him, which caused him to tumble back down and hurt himself.

Were the Secret Service snipers present when this occurred, and if so, why were they inactive at that time?

7. The Secret Service snipers did nothing before Crooks fired at Trump, even though he had drawn his gun and positioned himself to shoot him.

Why wasn’t he neutralized before he could shoot Trump, even after the Secret Service recognized him as a threat and after he took out a gun and took up position?

Why was there an 11-second delay between Crooks’ initial shot at Trump and the Secret Service snipers’ fatal shot, assuming they had seen him at 5:52 p.m.?

8. Trump arrived on stage at 6:02 p.m., and for ten minutes, no action was taken to remove him from the platform until Crooks was able to open fire on him at 6:12 p.m.

Why wasn’t Trump removed from the stage, even if Secret Service snipers saw Crooks on the rooftop and were unsure of what to do?

Who decided not to try to remove him, and was there an attempt to do so?

9. No drone monitoring was conducted during the event, which would have allowed law police to catch Crooks scaling the rooftop earlier.

Despite the Secret Service’s capacity to request drone monitoring, Bongino claims no drone was used to record the event.

Was that capability requested by the Secret Service? If yes, who disputed it and to what extent?

On Monday, Cheatle—who has acknowledged that she has no plans to retire despite receiving calls for her resignation—will have many questions to respond to.

Should the Secret Service Director be immediately fired?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading




( – Over the past eight years, leftists who have called for violence against President Trump and his followers have become all too familiar to us.

Now that an attempt on Trump’s life was foiled at his Pennsylvania rally the previous weekend, we must give these unlawful threats against the former president and his allies more careful thought.

A well-known far-left live streamer named Destiny—a man with a female name—went on a hateful rampage against the late Trump supporter Corey Comperatore during the past week after Comperatore was struck by a bullet that was accidentally fired at the president.

It didn’t take long for blue-haired lefties like Destiny to start joyfully celebrating the death of a Trump fan while lamenting the fact that the assassin didn’t manage to kill the former president.

His words promoting violence led to his (supposedly) demonetization on X, and he was also temporarily suspended from, a well-known streaming service, for making the same heinous statements.

Many conservatives supported Destiny’s right to make such remarks as an example of the First Amendment.

But Destiny changed his tone during the RNC, going from endorsing violence to openly endorsing political assassinations.


After facing a series of personal challenges, including a highly publicized divorce, Destiny suffered a dramatic meltdown.

During an impromptu interview with The Gateway Pundit journalist Elijah Schaffer during the RNC in Milwaukee, WI, the host of The Young Turks, Ana Kasparian, went out of her way to denounce these remarks even though some conservatives were quick to accuse all liberals of thinking the same way.

It’s alarming to see someone with Destiny’s level of popularity advocating for political violence. However, it’s heartening to see progressive colleagues like Ana Kasparian criticize him for his deplorable remarks and serve as a reminder that, occasionally, people have public breakdowns.

Should far-left liberals promoting violence, like Destiny, be immediately de-platformed and demonetized?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading