US, Britain Launch Air Strikes on Iran-Backed Yemeni Militia


The United States and Britain executed a series of decisive air strikes on military installations affiliated with Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen early Friday, marking a robust response to the militant group’s relentless assaults on vessels navigating the Red Sea. This military operation, involving air, surface, and subsurface platforms, targeted over a dozen Houthi locations, emphasizing a resolute stance against the escalating maritime threats posed by the group.

The decision to engage in this strategic military action stems from mounting concerns about the Houthi’s consistent attacks on commercial vessels, a worrisome trend that has disrupted maritime operations in the Red Sea. The heightened aggression, fueled by the militant group’s protest against Israel’s actions in Gaza, has instigated anxieties about the potential ramifications of a prolonged conflict in the region.

The White House, signaling the gravity of the situation, called a lid on President Biden’s engagements for the evening, underscoring the sensitivity of the matter. Notably, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s lack of notification to the president about his whereabouts while in the ICU at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center adds another layer of complexity to an already tense situation.

As anticipation of the military intervention grew, Houthi forces reportedly undertook defensive measures, transporting weapons and fortifying strategic positions. Local reports even indicated the evacuation of the Red Sea city of Hodeidah by Houthi militants, further underscoring the escalating tensions in the region.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak briefed his cabinet on the imminent military intervention, demonstrating a united front with the United States in addressing the growing threats posed by the Houthis. The involvement of other political figures, including the leader of Britain’s opposition Labour Party, Keir Starmer, and the speaker of the House of Commons, highlights the bipartisan concern over the potential ramifications of the Houthi’s actions.

In an era where geopolitical tensions are already heightened, the joint strike against the Iran-backed Houthis raises broader concerns about the possibility of this conflict evolving into a larger, potentially world war. Critics of the administration’s approach argue that a robust response is necessary to prevent a never-ending tit-for-tat scenario. Richard Goldberg, a Senior Adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, emphasized the need for a fundamental shift in the approach to Iran and its proxies.

Questions loom about whether President Biden has ordered the re-listing of the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization or frozen the $10 billion allocated for Iran. There is also speculation about potential military actions against the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in Yemen or Iran’s intelligence cargo ship.

The international community, including the United States and 13 other countries, issued a joint statement warning the Houthis of the consequences should they persist in threatening lives, the global economy, or the free flow of commerce in the region’s critical waterways. This collective response underscores the global unease surrounding the situation and the recognition that decisive actions are necessary to prevent further escalation and secure regional stability.

There was an attack on the American Embassy in Iraq later in the day, but it is unknown whether or not this was retaliatory or even related. 

As the United States and Britain confront the challenges posed by the Houthi militants, concerns persist about the potential for this conflict to spiral into a larger, more extensive conflagration with far-reaching implications for global security. The delicate balance in the Middle East remains at risk, demanding careful navigation to avoid the ominous specter of a broader world war.