Connect with us


Tourniquets Are Dangerous, Unless You Know This…

tourniquets are for dangerous

As you know, most people recommend you keep a tourniquet in a bug out bag or a survival bag; but did you know tourniquets are dangerous?

As a matter of fact, it’s proven when not using a tourniquet the correct way it is worse than not using a tourniquet at all.

I’ve never written about how tourniquets are dangerous before.

But after speaking with someone who claimed Jewish soldiers were using a special, easy to use tourniquet to save lives I knew I had vital information to share.

Yes, tourniquets are dangerous… but only when you use them in an improper fashion.

For this reason, I’m going to show you what you need to do so you can use a tourniquet to save a life.

If you own a tourniquet and don’t know how to use it, then you must see this.

If you don’t own one, you can get one here for FREE.

Once you have yours then the information in this blog will help you use it to save a life.

Without This Vital Information, Tourniquets Are Dangerous (Very Dangerous)

Everyone knows if a person is injured and is bleeding out of control the best thing to do is apply a tourniquet.

Right? I mean that’s what we’ve all been taught.

If someone’s bleeding everyone thinks you’re supposed to take a tourniquet and tie it around the affected limb.

What we’ve discovered is that isn’t always the best idea. This isn’t necessarily new knowledge. For instance, this was discovered almost 100 years ago in WWII.

On the other hand, it wasn’t until recently that we know why. Now we know it comes down to the type of tourniquet you use.

My guess is when you think of a tourniquet you think of a belt, or a rope, or something similar. Most people are trained to think those are the proper kinds of tourniquets for medical use (in contrast to a large bandage).

Here’s the biggest problem with these kinds of tourniquets. Once applied to a wound site they constrict blood flow in and out of the affected area. This causes several distinct side effects.

The first effect is blood remains trapped inside of the injured limb. This traps toxins and waste inside the wound. This hurts the affected limb. Once the tourniquet comes off, toxins rush back into the body.

The other side effect is the limb will start to die. As you know, blood carries oxygen throughout the body (which is essential for survival). A tourniquet like a belt or rope prevents blood from moving into the cells.

When this happens, the cells in the limb will die… and a possible amputation is likely.

This Is The Best Tourniquet For Saving A Life

—- Get Your FREE Tourniquet by going to this page.

As I mentioned, most of the problem with tourniquets comes down to the kind of tourniquet the person uses.

Using a belt, or a rope or anything similar is problematic.

Instead, you need to use a tourniquet called Combat Application Tourniquet (C-A-T). This is what Israeli soldiers along with U.S. military personnel are using to prevent limb loss in combat theaters.

As I mentioned, ropes and belts etc. cut off blood flow to the affected limb.

C-A-Ts do something different. They apply direct pressure around the entire limb and then they let blood flow in and out. That’s the biggest difference is they reduce the amount of blood flow to a trickle… as opposed to a full stop.

Want a FREE C-A-T Tourniquet? Get One Right Here.

This is what the Mayo Clinic says about the C-A-T:

“The C-A-T has a wide Velcro band and a one-handed windlass system, which tightens the band above a wound. Unlike improvised tourniquets, which act more like a ligature, commercial tourniquets provide true circumferential pressure that completely and consistently impedes arterial blood flow. The windlass is secured in a holder and locked in place with a Velcro tab.”

This is what the FREE C-A-T looks like – Click the picture or right here to get yours FREE.

tourniquets are dangerous


Here Are The Exact Steps To Use A Tourniquet To Save A Life

Now that you know the right kind of tourniquet to buy, you need to know how to use it.

The first thing you need to know? Which wound types require a tourniquet.

The Mayo Clinic says:

  • Terrorist incidents with high-velocity blast injuries to the limbs
  • Injuries in rural or wilderness areas where resources are limited and transport to definitive care may be difficult
  • Delayed industrial or farm accidents
  • Penetrating trauma from firearms and stabbings

Once you determine the wound type, it’s time to get to work.

Fortunately, the process of tourniquet application isn’t overly complicated. Tourniquets are only dangerous when you don’t know this info. 

I’ll tell you how to do it in two seconds.

Before I do I recommend you get this FREE tourniquet right here.

My friends at Survival Kit are giving them away. The only thing they ask is you cover shipping to your house.

After you’ve done that it’ll show up at your door in a few days.

Now, here are the steps for using tourniquets to save a life:

  1. Place the tourniquet slightly above the wound.
  2. Wrap the tourniquet firmly around the limb and pull firmly.
  3. Ensure blood loss has stopped and fasten the velcro closure.
  4. If bleeding occurs simply tighten until it stops.
  5. Take the person for medical attention.
  6. Only loosen the tourniquet if travel time to medical help is longer than an hour and bleeding has stopped.

That’s all it takes.

Of course, following these steps won’t guarantee a life or limb will be saved. But considering tourniquets are dangerous otherwise, these are the exact steps to take.

All Things Considered…

I can’t imagine an instance where you wouldn’t want to know this life-saving information.

Furthermore, the simple fact you get one for FREE means you must take immediate action on this info. 

This FREE C-A-T info will help save a life.

My friends at Survival Kit have extensive experience using C-A-Ts in crisis situations.

This is exactly why they’re giving them away.

They know massive disinformation about tourniquets is out there.

And they want everyone to have a tourniquet and the knowledge necessary to save lives in a crisis.

Get yours here now!

Continue Reading


Is Biden’s Brain Tapioca? One Tennessee Republican Thinks So


The White House would be required to notify Congress whenever the president takes a drug that could impact his alertness, judgment, or mood, under a new bill proposed by Tennessee Republican Rep. Andy Ogles.

“Joe Biden’s embarrassing outbursts of anger and incomprehensible speeches mirror the incalculable damage his policies have inflicted on our nation,” Rep. Ogles stated.

“Frequently slurred speech, abnormally long pauses, and the inability to string together five coherent words have put Biden’s mental and physical decline on full display,” he said. “It is unfair to the American people for the White House to be occupied by someone who is literally incapable of speaking.”

Ogles introduced his bill — the No Juicing Joe Act — because the White House “has refused” to test President Biden’s cognitive abilities “because they know he will fail miserably.” Biden is scheduled to debate former President Trump, the GOP nominee, later this month.

Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., introduced the No Juicing Joe Act, citing historical precedents where presidential health issues affected their duties. He pointed to President John F. Kennedy’s treatment by Dr. Max Jacobson, known as “Doctor Feelgood,” and Woodrow Wilson’s post-stroke incapacitation, which led to the 21st Amendment.

“The president, whose office is the most powerful on earth, must be accountable to the people, and it’s Congress’s duty to ensure accountability,” Ogles said.

In response, a White House spokesperson claimed that criticisms of Biden’s cognitive state were politically motivated. However, the growing number of incidents raises serious concerns. After losing numerous negotiations and witnessing the administration’s failures across various sectors, it’s becoming increasingly clear that these issues are not just about policy but about the president’s ability to perform his duties effectively.

The Republican National Committee’s research division posted several videos that appeared to show President Biden in a “perpetual state of confusion.” One video from his recent speech in Normandy commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-Day showed Biden bending down, seemingly uncertain whether it was time to sit down.

Questions about Biden’s mental acuity also circulated last week after a bombshell report interviewed 45 lawmakers and administration officials about Biden’s mental performance.

Biden, 81, is the oldest person to hold the presidency and has faced skepticism from voters and Republican lawmakers about his ability to do his job. Many Republicans and even some Democrats said the president showed his age in private meetings.

Most of the people interviewed by the report who were critical of Biden’s performance were Republicans, although some Democrats acknowledged the president showed his age in several exchanges. These interviewees participated in meetings with Biden or were briefed on them contemporaneously, including administration officials and other Democrats who did not express concerns about how the president handled the meetings.

White House officials, however, dismissed many of these accounts, saying such criticisms were motivated by partisan politics.

The growing concern over Biden’s mental fitness is driving legislative efforts like the No Juicing Joe Act to ensure transparency and accountability in presidential health, highlighting the critical need for a capable and alert leader in the White House. The American people deserve a president who can effectively communicate and make sound decisions, and it is Congress’s duty to uphold this standard.



POLL: Is Biden cognitively fit for office?


Continue Reading


House Holds AG Garland in Contempt, Referred for Criminal Charges


In a decisive move that upholds the rule of law, the House of Representatives voted to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress on Wednesday, referring the top Department of Justice (DOJ) official for criminal charges. This is a significant victory for those who believe in holding our leaders accountable and ensuring transparency in government.

The measure passed nearly along party lines in a 216 to 207 vote, with just one Republican, Rep. David Joyce of Ohio, betraying his party and his constituents. Joyce, a former prosecutor, argued against the resolution, claiming it would further politicize the judicial system. However, his lone dissent only highlights his failure to stand up for justice. It’s clear that Joyce must be voted out in November to restore true conservative leadership.

Garland’s refusal to turn over audio recordings of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Biden is a blatant obstruction of justice. These recordings are crucial for understanding Biden’s mishandling of classified documents and his mental state during the investigation. Hur concluded that no criminal charges were warranted, but described Biden as presenting himself “as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” This characterization raises serious concerns about Biden’s fitness for office and the potential leniency he received.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., led the charge, ensuring the contempt resolution passed. This action demonstrates the GOP’s unwavering commitment to transparency and accountability. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, voiced the frustration felt by many, stating, “There’s only one reason why the attorney general would do that. He doesn’t want us to hear it.”

This move is part of a broader effort by House Republicans to hold the Biden administration accountable. The pursuit of Hur’s audio tapes is just one aspect of the GOP’s wider impeachment inquiry into President Biden, investigating allegations that he used his political position to enrich himself and his family. Despite Biden’s denials of wrongdoing, the truth must come out.

The DOJ, however, is unlikely to act on this contempt referral, as indicated by past inaction on similar resolutions. This reality frustrates many Republicans, who see the DOJ as biased and unwilling to hold their own accountable. Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., expressed this sentiment, saying, “I’m not optimistic, because I think the DOJ has proven themselves very partisan and not honest brokers of how they apply the law.”


POLL: Should Merrick Garland be prosecuted by his own DOJ?


Continue Reading


The Dangers of Biden’s Weakness: Russian Ships off the Coast of Florida


When it comes to national security, President Biden’s actions are not just weak—they’re downright reckless and dangerous. This week, a fleet of Russian warships brazenly entered Cuban waters, preparing for military drills in the Caribbean. This aggressive move is a direct threat to the United States, underscoring the dangerous consequences of Biden’s soft stance on national security.

Just this week, a fleet of Russian warships brazenly entered Cuban waters, preparing for military drills in the Caribbean. This aggressive move is a direct warning to President Biden, who recently approved Ukrainian forces to strike targets within Russia using U.S. weaponry. Strategic intelligence analyst Rebekah Koffler, author of “Putin’s Playbook,” interprets this deployment as a clear message from Russian President Vladimir Putin to Washington: “We can touch you.”

“Putin wants to be close to the U.S. homeland at this time when the Russia-Ukraine crisis is on a highly escalatory trajectory — given Biden’s authorization to Ukraine. If something goes wrong and Ukraine strikes critical targets in Russia close to major cities, the Russian military can enable the Cubans to strike targets inside the U.S. or strike U.S. interests,” Koffler explains.

Three Russian warships arrived at Havana Bay on Wednesday, greeted by a 21-cannon salute. Following them is a nuclear-powered submarine, the Kazan, which Russia claims is not carrying nuclear weapons. This is a chilling reminder of the dangers we face due to Biden’s misguided policies.

President Biden’s recent actions have only emboldened our enemies. His reckless approval for Ukraine to use American missiles against Russian targets has escalated tensions to a boiling point. Ukraine, struggling in its battle of attrition against Russian forces, has failed to secure major breakthroughs despite these counterattacks.

The presence of Russian warships in Cuba and Putin’s threats to supply weapons to U.S. neighbors are stark reminders of the perilous situation we are in. Putin’s recent suggestion that Russia may authorize strikes on the U.S. via proxy countries is a direct consequence of Biden’s weak leadership.

“Most of all, the warships are a reminder to Washington that it is unpleasant when an adversary meddles in your near abroad,” said Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America program at the Wilson Center. This situation underscores the need for strong, decisive leadership to protect our national security, something Biden has utterly failed to provide.

Putin’s rhetoric and actions highlight the precarious position we are in under Biden’s leadership. His statement last week about supplying weapons to regions that can strike sensitive U.S. facilities should alarm every American: “If [the U.S.] considers it possible to deliver such weapons to the combat zone to launch strikes on our territory and create problems for us, why don’t we have the right to supply weapons of the same type to some regions of the world where they can be used to launch strikes on sensitive facilities of the countries that do it to Russia?”

Adding to this dangerous mix, President Biden has also approved the notorious Azov Battalion to use U.S.-provided weaponry. This battalion, infamous for its neo-Nazi roots, has been a central figure in Russian propaganda against Ukraine’s government. Biden’s support for such a group not only undermines our moral standing but also hands Putin ammunition to justify his aggressive actions.

President Biden’s approval of Ukraine to use American missiles to strike Russia and his support for the controversial Azov Battalion reflects a dangerous softness on national security. These decisions have not only emboldened our adversaries but also jeopardized global stability. It’s time for a leader who prioritizes America’s safety and stands firm against threats to our homeland. Biden’s actions are not just a lapse in judgment—they are a direct threat to our nation’s security.


Biden Admin Threatens to Stop Weapon Supplies to Israel

POLL: Is Biden weak on foreign policy?


Continue Reading