Connect with us


This Eruption Could Be The Ultimate SHTF Event

SHTF event

When most preppers think about a SHTF event, they typically think of things like tsunamis, blizzards, or an economic collapse. And, of course, a governmental takeover or EMP is often in the mix as well.

But there’s one SHTF event that can have a massive impact on the country, and can cost thousands (if not millions) of lives. And the scariest part is, this event is not simply a question of IF but WHEN it will happen.

The SHTF event I’m referring to is the upcoming Yellowstone eruption. And, looking at current events, it’s clear this supervolcano is likely going to erupt very soon.

So far, there have been over 1,500 earthquakes at Yellowstone National Park alone in the past seven weeks. This “swarm” of earthquakes began on June 12, 2017. Since then, approximately 1,562 earthquakes have occurred, shaking up the Park as well as its staff.

Apparently, during the second week of the swarm, a United States Geological Survey representative tried to inform the public that the earthquakes were “winding down.” However, the incidents have been continuing, with no clear sign of stopping.

According to reports, this is the heaviest earthquake swarm in half a decade. And, the more that the earthquakes occur, the greater the chances that this national landmark will erupt. And, when it does, more than half the nation will be in a world of hurt.

And it’s not just the supervolcano’s eruption we have to worry about, either. We also need to consider the post-eruption ramifications. For instance, you may not currently live close enough to be hit by the initial eruption.

However, mountains of ash will inevitably cover over half of the entire United States in less than three days after the initial blast. And this alone will cause death and devastation throughout the U.S.

Here’s a quick 2-minute video describing what I’m talking about:

That’s right. The eruption from this single supervolcano can dump at least 10 feet of volcanic ash across the U.S. and it will spread up to 1,000 miles away. This will make most of the nation uninhabitable for years.

Not only that, but food production will also be completely eliminated for the majority of the nation.

And, to top it all off, the United States will experience a “volcanic winter” because of the eruption. This will dramatically cool the planet down, as global temperatures decrease by as much as 20 degrees.

As you can see, this eruption is no joking matter. And that’s why we must do everything in our power to prepare beforehand. After all, like I said, it’s not a question of IF, but WHEN this disastrous event will occur.

Thankfully, we’ve got some survival tips to help you prepare for this incredible eruption. After all, like we always say, when you Prepare Now, you’re much more likely to Survive Later! Keep reading to discover some extra important survival tips that can help you survive this impending crisis.

This Eruption Could Be The Ultimate SHTF Event

According to Quora, there are many factors regarding risk management that we need to be aware of in order to prepare. We also need the correct approach in dealing with an event this size in order to make sure we have the best chance at survival. Here’s what they have to say about these things and more:

Risk management

Main requirements
  • Early information for coming eruption (most scientists think that the buildup preceding a catastrophic eruption would be detectable for weeks and perhaps months to years).
  • Minimize deaths and injures.
  • Save the order across the nation during the evacuation and later.
  • New housing for most of the nation.
  • Energy and clear water after eruption.
  • Food for citizens (for ten years or more).
  • Remove volcanic ash from millions of square kilometres, up to 2000 cubic kilometres.
  • Clear atmosphere as soon as possible.
Size of challenge
  • We need to rescue tens of millions of people.
  • Manage removal up to 2500 cubic kilometres (585 cubic miles) of volcanic ash in the area of millions of square miles.
  • Build tens of millions of houses.
  • Produce food for all the nation in the artificial environment (greenhouses).
  • Rebuild most of the nation infrastructure.
  • It means very massive use of technology – hundreds of millions of specialized UGV, robots, etc. Environment will not be very suitable for humans.
  • So suppose that we need probably 100,000 square kilometres of specialized factories and required energy for their operations.
Required technologies (short summary)

What are the near future technologies possible to manage this natural super-disaster?

It is the only one: “Universal self-replicating factory” – integrated set of premises, buildings, vehicles, computers, software, devices, engines, robots, 3D-printers, biotechnology products or artificial organisms, etc. which is possible to mine ore, prepare chemicals and materials, produce any tangible artifact that is produced within actual mankind technology (also all own parts). Simpler version is semi-universal factory, that is producing all except electronic chips (it can be ready within next 30 years, if required). More details see at: Pathway to the Solar system colonization, Milky Way and beyond session “Universal Factories”.


How to apply this technology:

  • Develop first Universal factory. Start process of self-replication.
  • In process of self-replication prepare required number of the factories (for example on the 100,000 square kilometres area).
  • Factories produce enough millions of UGV, robots, 3D-printers, for different tasks:
    • build power plants for energy production,
    • build houses,
    • build greenhouses for food production including livestock,
    • clear the water,
    • continually remove ash, clear the soil, revitalize ecosystems,
    • renew damaged infrastructure,
    • clear the atmosphere, …

Use all UGV and robots for direct volcano drilling, cooling and manage eruption.

But the key challenge will be the source of the energy for survival and disaster recovery.

No photovoltaics, no water energy. What are the possibilities for energy sources:

  • Wind
  • Coal
  • Nuclear reactors
  • Thermonuclear fusion

I believe, that only thermonuclear fusion is the solution in the case of this natural disaster. First prototype of this will not be ready before (2030), see Fusion power.


Former Democrat Tops NH Trump VP Poll


In an electrifying and unexpected development, a new poll from the University of New Hampshire Survey Center reveals that former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii tops the list of preferred running mates for former President Donald Trump. This strategic choice underscores Trump’s commitment to broadening his appeal and strengthening his base with an unconventional but highly effective candidate.

Tulsi Gabbard, who initially ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, courageously left her party two years later to become an independent. Now, she emerges as the favorite among nearly a quarter (24%) of New Hampshire voters who are not supporting President Biden. Gabbard’s ability to connect with a diverse electorate and her staunch opposition to the far-left agenda make her a powerful ally for Trump.

Gabbard’s support stands seven points ahead of biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, indicating a strong preference for Gabbard’s unique blend of political independence and principled leadership. This shows that voters are looking for leaders who are willing to stand up against the establishment and fight for American values.

Ramaswamy, along with other notable figures like Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, have endorsed Trump, yet Gabbard’s lead suggests a deeper resonance with voters seeking a fresh and unifying voice. Her conservative principles, military background, and dedication to freedom and the Constitution make her an ideal running mate for Trump.

Trump’s consideration of Gabbard is a testament to his strategic thinking and commitment to broadening his appeal. Gabbard, a veteran of the Iraq War and an officer in the Hawaii National Guard, brings a wealth of experience and a compelling personal story as the first Samoan-American elected to Congress. Her transition from a progressive Democrat to an independent has been marked by her steadfast dedication to fundamental freedoms, resonating with many conservatives who feel disenfranchised by the current political climate.

In a Fox News town hall in February, Trump hinted that Gabbard was on his short list for running mates. Her praise for Trump, acknowledging his resilience and willingness to fight against the Washington establishment, underscores a shared commitment to challenging the status quo and defending American values against the encroachment of socialism and government overreach.

Gabbard’s familiarity with New Hampshire, a crucial swing state, adds another layer of strategic advantage. Her presence in the state during her 2020 presidential run and her support for Republican candidates in 2022 have cemented her popularity among voters who are tired of the same old politics and crave genuine change.

By considering Gabbard as a running mate, Trump demonstrates his ability to think outside traditional party lines and appeal to a broader coalition. This bold move could be the key to uniting the nation behind his campaign, bringing together a diverse group of voters eager for a leader who prioritizes American values and freedoms.

As the 2024 election approaches, the prospect of a Trump-Gabbard ticket promises an exciting and dynamic campaign. This powerful combination of leadership, experience, and dedication to conservative principles is poised to capture the imagination and support of Americans from all walks of life, ensuring a strong and united front against the progressive agenda threatening our nation’s future.


POLL: Would you support Tulsi Gabbard for VP?


Continue Reading


SCOTUS Sides With “Three Strikes” Laws in Support of Second Amendment


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on May 23 in favor of the federal government in a case pivotal to the enforcement of a federal three-strikes gun law aimed at ensuring repeat offenders are appropriately penalized. This ruling reinforces the principle that those who repeatedly break the law, particularly with violent felonies or major drug offenses, should face stringent consequences, thereby protecting law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights.

Justice Samuel Alito, a stalwart defender of constitutional principles, authored the majority opinion in Brown v. United States, consolidated with Jackson v. United States. In a remarkable alignment, the decision saw a blending of ideologies, with one liberal justice joining the majority and a conservative justice siding with the dissenters. This highlights the importance and clarity of the case beyond traditional ideological divides.

Federal law rightly prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms, and the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) of 1984 was a significant step to address the disproportionate number of crimes committed by repeat offenders. The ACCA mandates a 15-year minimum sentence for individuals found guilty of illegally possessing a firearm if they have three or more prior convictions for serious drug offenses or violent felonies committed on separate occasions.

The recent Supreme Court ruling ensures that the severity of the law remains intact. It emphasizes that sentences under the ACCA should be based on the laws in effect at the time of the original convictions, maintaining the law’s integrity and original intent to deter habitual criminals. This is a win for those who believe in the Second Amendment and the rule of law, ensuring that dangerous individuals are kept from undermining our right to bear arms.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett stood firm in the majority, reflecting their commitment to upholding strict penalties for career criminals. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch joined parts of the dissent, showcasing the robust debate within the court. Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, known for their liberal leanings, also contributed to the discourse.

Justice Alito’s opinion clarified that the ACCA’s requirement for a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence remains for those convicted of illegal firearm possession if they have a history of serious drug offenses or violent felonies. The definition of a “serious drug offense” includes state crimes that carry a maximum sentence of at least 10 years and involve a controlled substance as defined by the Controlled Substances Act.

Alito highlighted that state crimes qualify as serious drug offenses if they involved a drug listed on federal schedules at the time of the original conviction, not based on any subsequent changes to those schedules. This prevents loopholes that could otherwise allow habitual offenders to evade justice based on technicalities, thus preserving the stringent measures intended by the ACCA.

The government’s interpretation aligns with the ACCA’s objectives, focusing on the inherent risk and seriousness of certain offenses likely committed by career criminals. This approach ensures that those with a history of significant drug or violent offenses face enhanced penalties, protecting society and upholding the sanctity of the Second Amendment by ensuring firearms do not end up in the hands of dangerous individuals.

Justice Jackson’s dissent argued for applying the drug schedules in effect at the time of the federal firearms offense, a perspective that the majority rightly found unconvincing given the ACCA’s clear intent and context.

This ruling follows the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in March 2022’s Wooden v. United States, affirming that multiple convictions from a single criminal episode do not count as multiple under the ACCA. The current deliberations on Erlinger v. United States, which question whether a judge or jury should decide on the application of enhanced sentencing, continue to underscore the Court’s dedication to ensuring fair yet firm justice.

In summary, the Supreme Court’s decision is a significant victory for the pro-Second Amendment community, reinforcing the importance of strict penalties for repeat offenders. This decision ensures that the rights of law-abiding citizens to bear arms are protected by keeping firearms out of the hands of those who pose a danger to society.


Supreme Court: Illegal Immgrants Can Be Detained Without Bond

POLL: Do you support this ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States?


Continue Reading


HILARIOUS: Biden Not On the Ballot in Ohio… Yet


In a delicious twist of irony, President Biden—who has tried to block former President Trump from appearing on ballots in several states—might himself be excluded from the Ohio ballot come Election Day. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose issued this hilarious warning on Tuesday, showcasing yet another instance of Democratic incompetence and hypocrisy.

Despite receiving weeks of warnings from LaRose’s office and the state legislature, the Ohio Democratic Party has hilariously bungled their way into potentially disqualifying Biden from the ballot. LaRose, a Republican, pointed out that the Democratic Party has yet to offer any solution that complies with existing law.

Ohio’s election law requires parties to certify their presidential candidates at least 90 days before Election Day. But in a move that screams “amateur hour,” the Democratic Party plans to certify Biden at its national convention in Wisconsin on August 19, just 75 days before the election—blatantly flouting the law.

“I’ve said from here to Colorado that it’s in the best interest of voters to have a choice in the race for president. I’m also duty-bound to follow the law as Ohio’s chief elections officer,” LaRose stated, barely containing his exasperation.

“As it stands today, the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee will not be on the Ohio ballot. That is not my choice. It’s due to a conflict in the law created by the party, and the party has so far offered no legally acceptable remedy,” he continued, likely shaking his head in disbelief.

“The Ohio House speaker said today there won’t be a legislative solution, so I’ve sent a letter to Ohio Democrats’ chair seeking (again) a solution that upholds the law and respects the voters. I trust they’ll act quickly,” he finished, probably chuckling at the absurdity of it all.

Ohio Democrats previously floated the idea that Ohio could accept a “provisional certification” for Biden’s candidacy, but LaRose quickly shut down this laughable suggestion, pointing out that state law makes no such allowances.

LaRose emphasized that either the state legislature must change the law to allow Biden’s certification, or the Democratic Party must get its act together. Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens, another Republican, bluntly stated that lawmakers won’t bail Biden out. “There’s just not the will to do that from the legislature,” Stephens told reporters, likely with a smirk.

Even Democratic Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo couldn’t hide her frustration with her own party’s ineptitude, stating, “We’ve seen the dysfunction here in this place. And I think we’ve seen that folks have not been able to put aside partisanship and hyper-partisanship and infighting.… I think at this point, you’re probably going to see either, you know, some sort of inner party effects or perhaps court action.”

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine assured voters that Biden would be on the ballot come November, arguing that if the legislature doesn’t act, then it’s “going to be done by the court.”

Ohio Democrats have yet to respond to LaRose’s Tuesday letter. The irony of Biden’s predicament—potentially being excluded from the ballot while having sought to exclude Trump—is nothing short of poetic justice. This fiasco is a fitting testament to the chaos and mismanagement that has become the hallmark of the Democratic Party.



POLL: Will Biden be the Democrat nominee in November?


Continue Reading