Connect with us


Top 5 Things To Look For In A Survival Flashlight

A survival flashlight is an extremely important survival tool. Not only will it allow you to use the light it provides to find your way in pitch black darkness, but its blinding light can also be useful to shine in an attacker’s eyes.

Survival flashlights are an important tool to help you stay safe (and alive). But, with so many options on the market, it can be tough to know which ones to invest in (and which to leave on the shelf).

Research shows this is the best survival flashlight on the market.

Thankfully, you’ll be able to make a much better purchasing decision once you become aware of these…

Top 5 Things To Look For In A Survival Flashlight

Various Brightness Options

A good survival flashlight must have multiple brightness settings. And the reasoning for this is simple.

For one, if you’re in pitch black darkness, having a sudden bright burst of light can hurt your eyes. Not to mention, if the rest of your group is sleeping, having a lower power setting can come in handy to not wake everyone up (this also works better when you’re needing to be stealthy).

Low power options are also great for saving your battery. This setting allows you to see where you’re going without giving you full brightness, therefore extending your battery life.

Make sure yours also has an SOS setting. This can be incredibly helpful in the event you’re in need of a rescue.

This survival flashlight contains FIVE Brightness Settings (including SOS and Strobe for Self-Defense).

LED Bulbs

LED bulbs are by far some of the best light sources you can have in your survival flashlight. That’s because they save energy, help increase the life of your battery, and are brighter than other bulbs. However, although they’re brighter, they don’t strain your eyes like other bulbs do.

Another huge benefit is, because they’re so efficient, your flashlight will need recharging (or changing out batteries) far less often than when using other bulbs.

They’re also much more durable than incandescent light bulbs – which comes in handy if you’re as clumsy as I am. It’s also great news for SHTF situations, where everything you own tends to take a beating.

The LED Bulbs in this flashlight last up to 100,000 hours and can be seen from 5 nautical miles away!

 Power Button On The Bottom

When looking at survival flashlights, it’s best if you get one with the power button on the bottom (rather than on the side).

This is extremely useful for a couple reasons. For one, having the power button on the side can cause it to turn on by accident while it’s in your pocket. This is especially true if you’re moving around a lot. And, if your flashlight is turned on without you knowing, it’ll drain your battery (and won’t be there for you when you need it most). However, with the button on the end, this is far less likely to happen.

Second, having the power button on the end allows you to keep an overhand grip on the flashlight (like a cop would while looking into your car) without accidentally bumping the power button.

This button placement can also make it way easier to hold your handgun in the other hand. With this method, you can easily turn on your flashlight to see the attacker, while simultaneously aiming your gun straight at his heart.

The flashlight so bright it will literally blind an attacker before you need to shoot him.

Here’s a video portraying one of the most effective ways to hold a gun and a survival flashlight at the same time.

Rechargeable Battery (Or AAA Batteries)

Any survival flashlight you own  needs to either be rechargeable or run on AAA batteries. That’s because, when your flashlight inevitably dies, you’ll need to be able to get it running quickly and efficiently so you can get back to business.

If you can’t recharge it, AAA batteries are the next best thing. That’s because these batteries are incredibly common, and can be found in basically any gas station store, grocery store, and household. They’re also incredibly compact, last a long time, and are easy to stock up on.

This flashlight uses either AAA Batteries OR an 18650 rechargeable battery for hours of continual use.

 Fits In Your Pocket

Let’s be honest here. Your survival flashlight may have lots of bells and whistles. But if you can’t fit it in your pocket, it’s going to be a pain in the ass to carry. Not only are you more likely to get distracted and leave it somewhere, but it’s also a hassle to dig out of your bug out bag (and don’t say it’ll always be in your hand, because it won’t).

A survival flashlight is meant to be an EDC (everyday carry) item. And that means it needs to be small enough to fit in your pocket so you can carry it everywhere, every day.

Granted, if you want to bring a huge flashlight with you, be my guest. But it needs to be in addition to your compact EDC flashlight. Not in place of it.

“The Torch” is the leading compact flashlight in America. See it here.

 The Best Compact Survival Flashlight On The Market

Like I said, there are tons of survival flashlights on the market. And with so many options, it can be hard to choose.

Luckily, I’ve done all the work for you. My team and I have been testing out loads of flashlights over the years, and we’ve seen the good, the bad, and the ugly. And, in all our experience, this flashlight right here has been the best one we’ve ever used in both everyday life and in emergency situations.

In fact, I believe in it so much I’m currently giving it away for Free for a VERY limited time. Click here to get yours now.


Democrat Mayor Welcomes Illegals to Denver


During a recent interview with CNBC, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston’s comments regarding the city’s approach to immigration underscore a troubling trend of prioritizing the interests of migrants over the well-being of American citizens.

Johnston’s admission that Denver is grappling with an influx of migrants is a damning indictment of the city’s failed open-door policies. Rather than acknowledging the inherent risks and challenges associated with unchecked migration, Johnston attempts to portray Denver’s approach as a delicate balancing act between compassion and pragmatism. However, his words betray a dangerous naivety that threatens to undermine the safety and prosperity of Denverites.

By championing an ideology of unlimited hospitality, Denver has effectively placed the burden of its misguided altruism squarely on the shoulders of its own citizens. Johnston’s assertion that the city is proud of its ability to manage the migrant crisis is not only arrogant but also deeply troubling. Instead of celebrating the city’s failure to control its borders, Denver should be prioritizing the needs and concerns of its own residents.

Johnston’s plea for federal assistance serves as a thinly veiled attempt to absolve Denver of its responsibility for the consequences of its reckless immigration policies. It is outrageous that hardworking taxpayers are expected to foot the bill for the city’s misguided generosity. Denverites should not be forced to accept cuts to city budgets and services in order to accommodate migrants who enter the country illegally.

Furthermore, Johnston’s insistence on portraying migrants as victims deserving of unwavering support only serves to exacerbate the problem. By perpetuating the myth of the noble migrant in need of rescue, Johnston glosses over the very real dangers and disruptions caused by uncontrolled immigration. Denverites deserve better than a mayor who prioritizes virtue signaling over their safety and prosperity.

It is time for Johnston and other proponents of open borders to face the harsh reality of their policies. Unrestricted immigration poses serious threats to national security, public safety, and economic stability. Denver cannot continue down this reckless path without risking irreparable harm to its own citizens.

In light of these challenges, it is imperative that Denver enact sensible immigration policies that prioritize the needs and interests of American citizens. This includes strengthening border security, enforcing immigration laws, and implementing measures to deter illegal immigration. Anything less would be a betrayal of the trust placed in Johnston by the people of Denver.


Illegals Get the VIP Treatment from Biden's DHS!

POLL: Should American cities welcome illegals?


Continue Reading


Texas Dem. Rep: No Taxes For Black Americans


In a recent episode of the “Black Lawyers Podcast,” Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a Democrat from Texas, ignited a firestorm of controversy with her proposal to exempt Black Americans from paying taxes as a form of reparations. This suggestion has triggered widespread outrage among conservatives, who see it as yet another attempt to further racialize American politics and deepen divisions within society.

Crockett’s proposition, which she herself admitted may not be successful due to the fact that many within the Black community are already struggling financially and may not be paying taxes, has been met with condemnation from conservative voices across the country. Critics argue that such a plan would not only be ineffective in addressing the underlying issues faced by Black Americans but would also exacerbate racial tensions and perpetuate a victimhood narrative.

By singling out one racial group for special treatment through tax exemptions, Crockett’s proposal threatens to further polarize an already divided nation along racial lines. Conservatives view this as yet another example of the left’s obsession with identity politics, where race takes precedence over individual merit and personal responsibility.

Moreover, Crockett’s suggestion of tax exemptions as a form of reparations is seen as deeply misguided and unfair. Conservatives argue that reparations, if they are to be considered at all, should be based on need and merit, rather than race. By proposing blanket tax exemptions based solely on race, Crockett fails to address the complex socioeconomic factors that contribute to inequality and disadvantage in America.

Conservatives also express concern about the lack of consistency and coordination between federal and state approaches to reparations. Crockett’s call for tax exemptions at the federal level raises questions about how such measures would interact with existing state-level initiatives, potentially leading to confusion and inequity in the distribution of resources.

As the debate over reparations continues to intensify, conservatives are calling for a more thoughtful and inclusive approach that focuses on addressing the root causes of inequality and promoting economic opportunity for all Americans, regardless of race. Crockett’s proposal, they argue, only serves to further entrench racial divisions and undermine efforts to achieve genuine unity and progress in the United States.



POLL: Should the federal government exempt black Americans from taxes?

Continue Reading


Whoopi Goldberg Claims Conservatives Want to “Bring Back Slavery”


In a recent episode of ABC’s “The View,” Whoopi Goldberg stirred controversy with her startling claim that some Republicans are inclined to “bring slavery back.” The comment, made during a discussion about the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision to reinstate an 1864 abortion ban, has sparked widespread condemnation, with critics lambasting Goldberg for her inflammatory and unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Goldberg’s assertion, delivered in the heat of the panel discussion, has been roundly denounced as not only inflammatory but also deeply irresponsible. By equating Republican policies on abortion with a desire to resurrect one of the darkest chapters in American history, Goldberg not only demonstrated a profound lack of understanding of the issues at hand but also showcased a troubling disregard for reasoned discourse.

Conservative voices have been particularly vocal in their condemnation of Goldberg’s remarks, highlighting the egregious nature of her comparison and the harm it does to meaningful dialogue. They argue that such hyperbolic and baseless accusations only serve to further polarize an already divided political landscape, making it increasingly difficult to find common ground on important issues.

Moreover, critics have pointed out the dangerous precedent set by Goldberg’s rhetoric, warning of the potential consequences of allowing such inflammatory statements to go unchallenged. They argue that by indulging in sensationalism and distortion, Goldberg not only does a disservice to the public discourse but also undermines the credibility of her own platform.

In the wake of the controversy, Goldberg has faced mounting pressure to retract or clarify her remarks, with many calling on her to apologize for the offense caused. However, as of yet, Goldberg has remained steadfast in her position, offering no indication of contrition or acknowledgment of the harm caused by her words.

Goldberg’s comments are part of a greater problem in American media and politics: One where conservative Americans are routinely demonized for their beliefs without consequence. This rhetoric should alarm all patriotic Americans interested in the free and honest discussion of ideas and politics.


POLL: Do you think conservatives want to bring back slavery?


Continue Reading