Connect with us


Shocking New Trafficking Revelations From Epstein Doc Drop


In the recent and final release of documents about the 2015 lawsuit involving accuser Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell, a disturbing web of allegations surrounding the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has resurfaced. The revelations in Giuffre’s 2016 deposition have unmasked prominent figures like Bill Richardson, Marvin Minsky, and Les Wexner, leading to a surge of conservative outrage as connections to the Democratic Party come to light.

The late Bill Richardson, a former Democratic governor of New Mexico and an ambassador to the United Nations during President Clinton’s tenure, finds himself accused by Giuffre. The fact that Richardson’s name was initially redacted from the filing raises eyebrows, fueling speculation about potential political motivations behind such actions. His sudden passing in September leaves lingering questions about accountability and justice for the alleged victims.

Marvin Minsky, a respected computer scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), posthumously faces accusations in the recent unsealing of documents. As conservatives scrutinize the timing and selective redactions in these documents, concerns arise about potential political interference and a reluctance to expose wrongdoing within influential circles.

Les Wexner, a major Democratic donor and founder of Limited Brands, is accused of sex trafficking by Giuffre. Despite not being charged with any crime, the conservative outrage amplifies as Wexner’s connections to the Democratic Party and his close ties with powerful figures become subjects of intense scrutiny. The revelation that Wexner claimed to have severed ties with Epstein in 2007 raises questions about the veracity of such claims and whether political considerations played a role in shielding him from earlier scrutiny.

The late Jean-Luc Brunel, a modeling agent who died in a French jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, adds another layer to the conservative narrative. As conservatives express outrage over the alleged victimization, questions arise about the broader implications of his connections within influential circles and whether political affiliations influenced the handling of his case.

Glenn Dubin, a financier who faced previous allegations unsealed in the documents, becomes a focal point for conservative commentators. His denial of any wrongdoing is met with skepticism, as conservatives question the selective unsealing of documents and the potential protection of individuals with political connections.

The legal proceedings take a perplexing turn as Giuffre’s deposition, initially part of the unsealed documents, is ordered to be stricken from the record and re-filed with new redactions. This move fuels conservative outrage, with accusations of a cover-up and manipulation of information to protect politically connected individuals. The lack of transparency in this process raises concerns about the integrity of the legal system and whether political motivations are influencing the pursuit of justice.

The accusations against a “well-known prime minister,” with the name deliberately omitted, become a lightning rod for conservative critics. Speculation runs rampant, with conservatives questioning whether political considerations played a role in suppressing information about high-profile individuals. The deliberate omission of names and the lack of a full account further contribute to the sense of outrage within conservative circles.

Alan Dershowitz, a prominent criminal defense attorney and a well-known figure in legal and political circles, faces accusations from Giuffre. As conservatives dissect the details of this case, they raise questions about the credibility of the accusations and whether political motivations influenced the legal proceedings. The history of lawsuits between Giuffre and Dershowitz, followed by an agreement to drop their cases, adds a layer of complexity to the conservative narrative.

Former President Bill Clinton’s entanglement in Giuffre’s accusations adds fuel to the conservative outrage. The claims that Clinton witnessed the sexual abuse of minors and had a close relationship with Epstein spark intense scrutiny. Conservatives question the veracity of Clinton’s denials and whether political considerations have shielded him from deeper investigations. The recent dispute by Clinton’s spokesperson over other claims in the documents further intensifies conservative skepticism.

Giuffre’s claims against Prince Andrew, Duke of York, who allegedly paid her $15,000 for sex, became a rallying point for conservative commentators. The intricate details of financial transactions and interactions with high-profile individuals lead conservatives to question the extent of political protection and whether ties to the Democratic Party influenced legal outcomes.

The unsealing of nearly 1,500 pages of documents, including the deposition of another Epstein accuser, Sarah Ransome, amplifies conservative concerns. As conservatives scrutinize the content, they express outrage over the breadth of the alleged criminal activities and the potential complicity of influential individuals. The sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell to 20 years in a separate case raises questions about the depth of the network and whether political considerations have shielded certain individuals from justice.

The outrage within conservative circles grows as they delve into the intricate details of the case, scrutinizing every connection to the Democratic Party and raising concerns about potential political motivations behind legal decisions. The complexity of the Epstein case and its implications continue to reverberate, fueling conservative demands for transparency, accountability, and a thorough investigation into the alleged wrongdoing of influential figures with ties to the Democratic Party.




Hunter Biden Caught RED HANDED Lying Under Oath


House Republicans have detonated a political bombshell, exposing the brazen corruption and arrogance of the Biden family. They have unveiled indisputable evidence proving that Hunter Biden lied under oath multiple times during his congressional deposition earlier this year. This scandal epitomizes the Biden Administration’s systemic corruption and disregard for the rule of law.

The House Ways & Means Committee convened a crucial session on Wednesday to discuss documents protected under IRS code 6103, a section of the tax code designed to keep sensitive information confidential. The committee’s decision to release this material, despite the severe legal ramifications, underscores the gravity and urgency of the situation.

“Hunter Biden has once again demonstrated his belief that there are two systems of justice in this country – one for his privileged family and one for everyone else,” House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith thundered to Fox News Digital. “Not only did Hunter Biden brazenly refuse to comply with his initial subpoena until threatened with criminal contempt, but he also had the audacity to lie before Congress. This investigation and the documents released today are not about a personal vendetta against Hunter Biden; they are about ensuring the equal application of the law in a system that his family seems to believe they are above.”

Smith revealed that the documents show Hunter Biden lied at least three times during his deposition. “Lying during sworn testimony is a felony offense that the Department of Justice has prosecuted numerous individuals for in recent years, and the American people demand the same accountability for the son of the President of the United States,” Smith declared. “Hunter Biden’s lies under oath and obstruction of a congressional investigation into his family’s blatant corruption cast a shadow over his entire testimony. The newly released evidence confirms, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the only witnesses who can be trusted to tell the truth in this investigation are the IRS whistleblowers.”

The committee asserts that Hunter Biden mischaracterized his role at his firm, Rosemont Seneca, and actually controlled bank accounts he denied having under oath. Emails between Hunter Biden and his former associate Devon Archer show he helped a man named Miguel Aleman with visa documents, directly contradicting his testimony. Furthermore, WhatsApp records reveal that Hunter Biden only spoke with one Zhao — Henry Zhao of Chinese energy firm CEFC — debunking his claim of a mistaken identity due to intoxication.

In one explosive WhatsApp message, Hunter Biden blatantly leveraged his father’s position, telling a Chinese business associate from CEFC that he and his father would ensure “you will regret not following my direction.” Hunter Biden demanded a $10 million wire for his joint venture with CEFC, SinoHawk Holdings.

“I am sitting here with my father, and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,” Hunter Biden told Henry Zhao, the director of Chinese asset management firm Harvest Fund Management. “And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge, you will regret not following my direction.” Zhao responded, “CEFC is willing to cooperate with the family.”

Hunter Biden has been charged in two separate jurisdictions stemming from Special Counsel David Weiss’ years-long investigation into him. He pleaded not guilty to federal gun charges in U.S. District Court for Delaware and federal tax charges in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The charges include making false statements during the purchase of a firearm, related to information required to be kept by a licensed firearm dealer, and possession of a firearm by a person who is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance.

IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler approached Congress, alleging that prosecutorial decisions in the federal investigation into the president’s son were influenced by politics. They claimed Weiss allowed the statute of limitations to expire for tax charges against Hunter Biden from 2014 and 2015 in D.C., and Hunter Biden should have been charged with tax evasion for 2014 and for filing false tax returns for 2018 and 2019, particularly concerning income from Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings. Fox News Digital reported in December 2020 that Hunter Biden failed to report “approximately $400,000” in income from his position on Burisma’s board in 2014.

The American public is fed up with a system rigged in favor of the powerful and well-connected. This is a direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. The time for accountability is now. Hunter Biden and his family’s blatant disregard for the law cannot be tolerated any longer. The American people demand justice.


Hunter Biden

POLL: Does Hunter Biden belong in prison?


Continue Reading


Biden’s Reckless Election Stunt: Draining Strategic Reserves to Lower Gas Prices


In a desperate and ill-advised move, the Biden administration announced on Tuesday that it is releasing 1 million barrels of gasoline from a Northeast reserve established after Superstorm Sandy, ostensibly to lower prices at the pump this summer. This blatant attempt to manipulate gas prices ahead of the election underscores the administration’s willingness to jeopardize national security for political gain.

The gasoline will be sold from storage sites in New Jersey and Maine in increments of 100,000 barrels, creating a competitive bidding process to ensure it reaches local retailers ahead of the July 4 holiday. The Energy Department claims this will help “lower costs for American families and consumers,” but the real intention is clear: to curry favor with voters by artificially lowering gas prices.

The release follows a congressional mandate to sell off the 10-year-old Northeast reserve and close it. This reserve, established under President Obama, has never been used and costs about $19 million a year to maintain. Its sale, which provides only minimal relief during a severe shortage, highlights the administration’s short-sightedness and disregard for strategic planning.

Gasoline prices average about $3.60 per gallon nationwide, up 6 cents from a year ago, according to AAA. Tapping into the gasoline reserves is one of the few actions a president can take to control inflation, a major election year liability for the party in power.

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm stated that the Biden administration is “laser-focused on lowering prices at the pump for American families.” However, this short-term solution ignores the primary purpose of strategic reserves: to provide emergency relief in times of severe national crises, not to manipulate market prices for political benefit.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre touted this release as part of Biden’s efforts to lower gas and energy costs, including historic releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) and investments in clean energy. Yet, Biden’s previous decision to drain the SPR in 2022, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, already pushed the stockpile to perilously low levels not seen since the 1980s. This reckless depletion of a critical national security asset for short-term political gain drew sharp criticism from Republicans.

Despite attempts to refill the SPR, it still stands at over 367 million barrels, significantly lower than pre-Russia-Ukraine war levels. This makes the U.S. vulnerable in the event of a true energy emergency, as the SPR is intended to be the nation’s emergency oil supply, not a tool for electioneering.

The release of the 42-million-gallon Northeast reserve, which must be transferred or delivered by June 30, is a misguided strategy that offers minimal impact on gasoline prices nationally. As analyst Patrick De Haan from GasBuddy points out, the reserve amounts to just 2.7 hours of total U.S. gasoline consumption, providing negligible relief.

This ill-conceived plan not only undermines the strategic purpose of the reserve but also sets a dangerous precedent of using emergency resources for political maneuvering. Biden’s actions highlight a disturbing trend of prioritizing political optics over national security and long-term stability.



POLL: Is Biden trying to manipulate the election results by putting America at risk?


Continue Reading


Biden Authorized “Deadly Force” In Mar-a-Lago Raid


In an alarming display of federal overreach and political maneuvering, it has been revealed that Joe Biden’s administration was prepared to have his main political rival, Donald Trump, and his family killed as part of a dramatic publicity stunt.

On Tuesday, Judge Aileen Cannon unsealed a series of motions related to Jack Smith’s controversial classified documents case against Trump. Among the shocking revelations was the fact that Biden’s FBI authorized the use of deadly force during their raid on Mar-a-Lago in August 2022.

This brazen action by armed FBI agents, ready to confront Trump, demonstrates the extreme lengths to which Biden’s administration is willing to go. The filing stated: “Should FPOTUS [Trump] arrive at MAL [Mar-a-Lago], FBI MM EM and OSCs will be prepared to engage with FPOTUS and USSS Security Team.” Furthermore, it added, “Should USSS provide resistance or interfere with FBI timeline or accesses, FBI MM EM will engage with [redacted] and [redacted] will engage with USSS POC’s per existing liaison relationships.”

A chilling screenshot of the deadly force instructions outlined the conditions under which DOJ law enforcement officers could use deadly force: only when necessary, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury.

This unprecedented move comes after Biden paved the way for his Justice Department to arrest his political opponent by retroactively revoking Trump’s executive privilege. This revocation facilitated the subpoenaing of Trump, which in turn allowed the Justice Department to charge him with federal crimes.

Following the subpoena, federal agents arrived at Mar-a-Lago, retrieving documents and instructing the former president to add an extra lock to his storage locker. However, two months later, the FBI conducted a full-scale raid on Mar-a-Lago, ransacking Trump’s belongings without allowing his lawyers to be present.

The situation escalated when, in November 2022, Jack Smith was appointed special counsel to investigate the documents at Trump’s Florida residence. By June 2023, Trump faced an indictment on 37 counts related to Smith’s classified documents case, including charges of willful retention, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and making false statements.

This entire episode underscores the alarming extent of Biden’s politicization of the Justice Department and the dangerous precedent it sets for using federal power to target political opponents.


POLL: Is Biden turning the Justice Department into political goons?


Continue Reading