REPORT: Bill Clinton To Be Named As Epstein Associate In Court Docs


The conservative community is buzzing with anticipation over the imminent release of court documents linking former President Bill Clinton to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 

The New York Post‘s recent revelation has sparked concern among conservatives. Nevertheless, the report is shedding light on Clinton’s involvement (under the pseudonym “John Doe 36”) in more than 50 instances within the redacted papers tied to a 2015 lawsuit initiated by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s accusers.

According to the New York Post, these references to Clinton are believed to be a result of Giuffre’s efforts to compel the former president to testify against Epstein and his alleged co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. The 2015 lawsuit has become a focal point, revealing attempts by both Maxwell and Giuffre to pressure Epstein into divulging information in 2016, a time when he consistently invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during a deposition.

The disclosure that over 170 names of individuals associated with Epstein are set to be exposed in these documents adds weight to the controversy. This development comes after a federal judge in Manhattan decided to unseal the papers, unraveling a network of people connected to the disgraced financier.

Despite Clinton’s denial of any inappropriate connections with Epstein, the New York Post emphasizes his photographed interactions with the sex offender and multiple flights on Epstein’s private jet. The former president’s involvement with Epstein appears to go beyond mere acquaintance, with reports suggesting that he welcomed both Maxwell and Epstein to the White House in 1993, following a donation made by Epstein for the refurbishment of the Oval Office.

This revelation about Clinton’s potential involvement in the Epstein case aligns with a broader narrative gaining traction among conservatives. Epstein’s death in August 2019, officially ruled as suicide by hanging in his Manhattan jail cell, has left conservatives with lingering questions. The unfolding details in these court documents may offer a deeper understanding of the intricate web of relationships involving Epstein and his influential associates, prompting renewed scrutiny and skepticism.