Connect with us


President Trump INDICTED On Federal Charges AGAIN!

President Trump INDICTED On Federal Charges AGAIN!

( – Federal charges have been filed against former President Trump due to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s lengthy investigation have been brought against him.

Trump is accused of mishandling documents and obstructing justice on at least seven federal offenses.

He has been told to show up in Miami federal court on Tuesday. The indictment was announced by Trump on his Truth Social social media channel.

“Joe Biden has 1850 boxes at the University of Delaware, additional boxes in Chinatown, D.C., with even more boxes at the University of Pennsylvania, and documents were strewn all over his garage floor where he parks his Corvette and which is “secured” by only a garage door that is paper thin and open most of the time,” Trump said on Truth Social.

“The corrupt Biden Administration has informed my attorneys that I have been Indicted, seemingly over the Boxes Hoax,” he added.

In his statement, Trump stated that he has “been summoned to appear at the Federal Courthouse in Miami on Tuesday, at 3 PM.”

Trump has been charged twice already this year. In April, Trump entered a not-guilty plea after being charged by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg with 34 felonies of first-degree business record falsification.

Trump wrote on Twitter, “I never thought it possible that such a thing could happen to a former President of the United States, who received far more votes than any sitting President in the history of our country and is currently leading, by a wide margin, all Candidates, both Democrat and Republican, in Polls of the 2024 Presidential Election. “I AM A MAN OF INNOCENT!”

“This is indeed a DARK DAY for the United States of America,” Trump continued.

“We are a nation that is seriously and quickly declining, but by working together, we can make America great once more.”

Smith was chosen by Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into Trump’s alleged unlawful storage of confidential data at his Mar-a-Lago residence in November 2022.

After the FBI executed an unusual raid on his private property in August 2022, the Justice Department began looking into the situation.

Trump brought 15 cartons of presidential records to his Florida mansion, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) informed Congress in February 2022.

The 15 boxes were found by NARA when they extricated them from Mar-a-Lago, and they “identified items marked as classified national security information within the boxes.” NARA forwarded the case to the Justice Department.

Those boxes allegedly held formal correspondence between Trump and foreign heads of state and “classified national security information.”

A letter from Kim Jong Un to Trump, a menu for a birthday meal, and a cocktail napkin were among the classified items that the FBI purportedly seized during its raid in August.

In the past, Trump has claimed that the National Archives did not “find” the records; instead, they were “given, upon request.”

“There was “no need” for the raid,” according to sources close to the former President, adding that “he had been cooperating.”

In the 15 boxes, Trump first gave to the NARA, the FBI’s inquiry “established that documents bearing classification markings, which appear to contain National Defense Information (NDI) were among the materials contained,” according to the affidavit.

“A preliminary triage of the documents with classification markings revealed the following approximate numbers: 184 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 documents marked as CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked as SECRET, and 25 documents marked as TOP SECRET,” according to the affidavit.

According to the unsealed and heavily redacted affidavit used to support the raid, the FBI claimed it had “probable cause to believe” that additional records containing classified information, including National Defense Information, would be discovered on the grounds of the Mar-a-Lago residence beyond what he had already turned over to the NARA.

The property receipt from the FBI raid on August 8, 2022, states that over 20 boxes of materials were taken from the location by FBI agents, including a set of documents identified as “Various classified/TS/SCI documents,” which stands for top secret/sensitive compartmented information.

Records with that level of government classification may contain information relating to human intelligence or information that, if made public, might endanger international relations, the lives of intelligence agents deployed abroad, or both.

However, the categorization also includes data on national security pertaining to the President of the United States’ everyday activities.

The property receipt also noted the collecting of four sets of top-secret records, three sets of secret documents, and three sets of confidential records by FBI agents.

However, it contains no information regarding any of those items. The government searched because it thought there had been a breach of federal law:

  • Gathering, transferring, or losing defense information is prohibited by 18 USC 793.
  • Concealment, removal, or mutilation is prohibited by 18 USC 2071.
  • Destruction, alteration, or fabrication of data in federal investigations is prohibited by 18 USC 1519.

According to the Espionage Act, “gathering, transmitting, or losing defense information” is an accusation.

The charge follows last year’s discovery of confidential documents in President Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center.

These documents came while serving in the U.S. Senate and as vice president during the Obama administration.

Garland initially selected U.S. Attorney John Lausch to review the sensitive documents found at the Penn Biden Center at the time.

More secret documents were discovered at Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware, home in December but weren’t made public until this year.

Robert Hur, an assistant U.S. attorney general, was eventually named by Garland as special counsel to look into Biden’s inappropriate retention of secret documents. Hur replaced Lausch as the head of the DOJ probe.

Additionally, secret documents were discovered at former vice president Mike Pence’s Indiana residence.

Following the Justice Department’s investigation into the case, Fox News announced last week that Pence will not face any charges.

There’s still so much unknown over the special counsel probe on Biden.

Additionally, Smith assumed control of the Justice Department’s inquiry into the Capitol disturbance on January 6, 2021.

In that capacity, he investigated any interference by Trump or other authorities with the democratically elected President of the United States in 2020, including ratifying the Electoral College vote on that day.

The White House chose not to respond.

This is a developing story.

Copyright 2023,




( – Joe Biden has decided not to run for reelection.

On Sunday afternoon, Biden declared his plan and promised to provide further details shortly.

“It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your President,” Biden’s statement read. “And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

Although Vice President Kamala Harris was expressly endorsed as his successor, he congratulated her in his statement for “being an extraordinary partner in all this work.”

But Biden later gave “my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year” in a statement uploaded on X.

Then, in a powerful message to Democrats, Biden urged them to unite and defeat Trump, emphasizing the importance of collective action in the upcoming election.

Do you believe VP Kamala Harris will be the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading


9 Secret Service Failures that Led to Trump Almost Being Assassinated

9 Secret Service Failures that Led to Trump Almost Being Assassinated

( – This past Saturday, during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump came dangerously close to being assassinated in what is believed to be the biggest Secret Service blunder in forty years.

The fact remains that the organization tasked with defending Trump was unable to prevent the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, from setting up shop less than 500 feet away, killing Corey Comperatore, a 50-year-old volunteer fire chief, and hitting President Trump in the ear.

Numerous investigations are in progress, but there have been few replies yet. Kimberly Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee on Monday.

The following nine significant security lapses by the Secret Service that we are now aware of require attention:

1. There was an apparent security concern from the rooftop from where Crooks fired shots at Trump. According to NBC News, the Secret Service had recognized the rooftop as a possible point of vulnerability in the days leading up to the rally.

Why was the building given to local law enforcement and not included in the Secret Service’s inside perimeter? Why wasn’t the building’s perimeter secured? How did rally participants see Crooks ascending to the rooftop and positioning himself before the police could stop him?

When did the Secret Service’s counter-sniper teams learn about him, and why weren’t any of them designated to keep an eye on the rooftop?

2. The Secret Service allowed local police enforcement to be housed inside the structure instead of outside on the roof. According to Cheatle, the choice was to house local law enforcement inside the structure instead of on top of it.

She asserted that the roof’s “slope” was a “safety factor” in the decision. Dan Bongino, a podcast presenter and former Secret Service agent, has dubbed that “bullsh-t.”

In his July 18, 2024, podcast episode, Bongino stated that he had heard from sources that local police snipers were placed inside because they were pitted against counter-snipers and thought they could accomplish the task from the building’s second story.

This raises the question: Why weren’t counter-snipers on the rooftop watching for would-be snipers?

3. The building’s exterior was not secure, which gave Crooks access to the rooftop. Who was guarding the building from the outside or the rooftop from below, even if local police snipers were not stationed on the rooftop?

Did local law enforcement officers have a watch duty at the building? The Washington Post stated that although the agency had planned ahead, local police had informed the Secret Service before Saturday that they did not have the means to place a patrol car and officer outside the facility.

Why didn’t the Secret Service devise a backup strategy? How did Crooks manage to go to the top unhindered and get a direct line of sight with Trump?

4. About three hours before Trump spoke, at around 3 p.m., local law police noticed Crooks near a magnetometer with a range finder. After that, they lost sight of him. Why hadn’t law enforcement or the Secret Service questioned or followed him earlier?

CNN reports that Crooks caused a stir when he passed past magnetometers erected to check participants for the presence of a range finder. This device resembles a tiny pair of binoculars and is frequently used by the military or hunters to locate targets.

According to Bongino, there is disagreement over whether he used magnetometers in real life. Nevertheless, he was supposedly seen close to them.

The questions are: Who saw Crooks using the range finder, and who was informed of the sighting? Why wasn’t he followed up with or questioned at that point?

5. Crooks was not stopped or questioned even though local law enforcement officers reportedly saw him about an hour before Trump was scheduled to speak.

They saw him hanging outside the building, scoping the rooftop, returning with a backpack, and pulling out a range finder. They reported him to a command center.

It is unclear to whom Crooks was reported, whether the Secret Service knew about him then, and why he was not apprehended or questioned in light of his suspicious activity.

How was he permitted to ascend onto the rooftop without being stopped if he was under the notice of the Secret Service or local law enforcement?

6. About 20 minutes before Trump entered the stage, at 5:52 p.m., the Secret Service allegedly saw Crooks on the rooftop. Despite this, the agency did not prevent Trump from taking the platform.

At 5:52 p.m., ABC News reported he was spotted on the rooftop by Secret Service snipers. Why was Trump permitted to speak on stage even though?

When a local police officer observed Crooks on the rooftop sometime around 6:02 p.m., it was said that he pointed his gun at him, which caused him to tumble back down and hurt himself.

Were the Secret Service snipers present when this occurred, and if so, why were they inactive at that time?

7. The Secret Service snipers did nothing before Crooks fired at Trump, even though he had drawn his gun and positioned himself to shoot him.

Why wasn’t he neutralized before he could shoot Trump, even after the Secret Service recognized him as a threat and after he took out a gun and took up position?

Why was there an 11-second delay between Crooks’ initial shot at Trump and the Secret Service snipers’ fatal shot, assuming they had seen him at 5:52 p.m.?

8. Trump arrived on stage at 6:02 p.m., and for ten minutes, no action was taken to remove him from the platform until Crooks was able to open fire on him at 6:12 p.m.

Why wasn’t Trump removed from the stage, even if Secret Service snipers saw Crooks on the rooftop and were unsure of what to do?

Who decided not to try to remove him, and was there an attempt to do so?

9. No drone monitoring was conducted during the event, which would have allowed law police to catch Crooks scaling the rooftop earlier.

Despite the Secret Service’s capacity to request drone monitoring, Bongino claims no drone was used to record the event.

Was that capability requested by the Secret Service? If yes, who disputed it and to what extent?

On Monday, Cheatle—who has acknowledged that she has no plans to retire despite receiving calls for her resignation—will have many questions to respond to.

Should the Secret Service Director be immediately fired?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading




( – Over the past eight years, leftists who have called for violence against President Trump and his followers have become all too familiar to us.

Now that an attempt on Trump’s life was foiled at his Pennsylvania rally the previous weekend, we must give these unlawful threats against the former president and his allies more careful thought.

A well-known far-left live streamer named Destiny—a man with a female name—went on a hateful rampage against the late Trump supporter Corey Comperatore during the past week after Comperatore was struck by a bullet that was accidentally fired at the president.

It didn’t take long for blue-haired lefties like Destiny to start joyfully celebrating the death of a Trump fan while lamenting the fact that the assassin didn’t manage to kill the former president.

His words promoting violence led to his (supposedly) demonetization on X, and he was also temporarily suspended from, a well-known streaming service, for making the same heinous statements.

Many conservatives supported Destiny’s right to make such remarks as an example of the First Amendment.

But Destiny changed his tone during the RNC, going from endorsing violence to openly endorsing political assassinations.


After facing a series of personal challenges, including a highly publicized divorce, Destiny suffered a dramatic meltdown.

During an impromptu interview with The Gateway Pundit journalist Elijah Schaffer during the RNC in Milwaukee, WI, the host of The Young Turks, Ana Kasparian, went out of her way to denounce these remarks even though some conservatives were quick to accuse all liberals of thinking the same way.

It’s alarming to see someone with Destiny’s level of popularity advocating for political violence. However, it’s heartening to see progressive colleagues like Ana Kasparian criticize him for his deplorable remarks and serve as a reminder that, occasionally, people have public breakdowns.

Should far-left liberals promoting violence, like Destiny, be immediately de-platformed and demonetized?

Copyright 2024.

Continue Reading