Connect with us

Featured

President Biden Proposes Resettling Palestinians in America

palestinian-demonstrators-burn-tyres-throw-rocks

In a strong rebuke to President Joe Biden’s immigration and resettlement policies, prominent Republican members of Congress are taking decisive action to block the administration’s efforts to bring Palestinians into American communities. Representatives Andy Ogles (R-TN), Tom Tiffany (R-WI), and Scott Perry (R-PA), along with a significant number of Senate Republicans, are spearheading a movement to ensure that American security and community stability are not jeopardized by what they view as a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.

At the heart of their effort is a proposal to include a stringent provision in the Fiscal Year 2025 spending bill. This provision aims to prevent any federal funds from being used to issue visas or grant parole to individuals holding passports issued by the Palestinian Authority. This legislative push is a direct response to whispers within the corridors of power that the Biden administration is considering using the federal government’s refugee resettlement program to facilitate the entry of Palestinians into the United States.

The opposition from these congressional Republicans is fueled by a profound concern over national security and the preservation of American cultural and societal norms. Their actions resonate with a significant segment of the American populace that is increasingly wary of liberal immigration policies, which are often seen as prioritizing global humanitarian concerns over domestic well-being and security.

The arguments laid out by Reps. Ogles, Tiffany, and Perry in their letter to House appropriators are unequivocal. They challenge the administration’s rationale head-on, articulating a common-sense perspective that questions why America should shoulder the responsibility of resolving global conflicts through domestic resettlement. Their contention is robust: the United States cannot—and should not—be the world’s caretaker, especially when it comes to absorbing populations from conflict zones with prevalent anti-American sentiments and significant terrorist affiliations.

This position is particularly poignant in light of the ongoing support for Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, among the Palestinian population. The representatives argue that importing individuals from such environments without foolproof vetting mechanisms poses an unacceptable risk to national security. They point out that the logistical challenges of thoroughly screening for extremist ties or sympathies are immense, casting doubt on the government’s ability to manage these risks effectively.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and 35 other Senate Republicans have also entered the fray, demanding transparency and specifics from the Biden administration concerning its plans for Palestinian resettlement. Their request highlights a broader skepticism about the administration’s ability to handle this high-risk group, given the complex dynamics of Gaza and the West Bank, where political allegiance often intersects dangerously with extremist activity.

The Republicans’ proactive stance includes legislative efforts such as the “GAZA Act,” introduced last year by Ogles and Tiffany, which seeks to outright ban the Biden administration from issuing visas to Palestinians. This act represents a concrete step toward safeguarding American borders and society from the infiltration of potentially radical elements under the guise of humanitarian aid.

The broader implications of these legislative efforts underscore a deep-seated commitment among these Republican lawmakers to uphold principles of national sovereignty and secure borders. They see the unregulated influx of refugees and immigrants from high-risk regions as a direct threat to the safety and cohesion of American communities. By insisting on regional solutions where neighboring states take on a more significant role in resolving local crises, they are advocating for a more balanced, security-conscious approach to international humanitarian problems.

The conservative critique of Biden’s proposed resettlement plans is also reflective of a larger ideological clash over America’s role in the world and the direction of its immigration policy. Republicans argue that the administration’s approach not only stretches America’s resources thin but also exposes the country to unprecedented levels of risk, all while many American citizens continue to face economic and social challenges that demand urgent attention.

In championing these measures, Representatives Ogles, Tiffany, Perry, and their Senate counterparts are not merely engaging in partisan politics. They are voicing a fundamental concern about the direction in which America is headed under the Biden administration’s policies. Their actions are a call to prioritize American security and interests, challenging the administration to reconsider its obligations to its citizens over international allure.

As this debate unfolds, the staunch opposition from these Republican lawmakers serves as a critical counterbalance to what they perceive as the Biden administration’s overzealous and poorly considered approach to international humanitarian crises. Their efforts reflect a broader conservative mandate to protect American values, security, and prosperity from policies that may undermine them in the guise of global cooperation and aid.

Do you support Biden’s plan to resettle Palestinian refugees in America?

 

london-uk-9-dec-2023-propalestinian

POLL: Do you support Biden’s plan to resettle Palestinian refugees in America?

Continue Reading

Featured

SHAMELESS: Hunter Biden Uses Sandy Hook Memorial to Wheel and Deal

syktyvkar-komi-republic-russia-december-10

Hunter Biden shamelessly used a Sandy Hook memorial service to arrange a clandestine meeting between his father, Joe Biden, and his Chinese business partners, according to new texts. This revelation is yet another glaring example of the deep-seated corruption within the Biden family and their utter disregard for ethical boundaries.

On December 12, 2017, Hunter Biden leveraged the Chinese messaging app WeChat to communicate with Liu Yadong, a top executive at the Chinese oil giant CEFC. His message was clear: arrange a meeting between Joe Biden and Yadong during a time meant to honor the victims of a tragic school shooting. “Can you meet this evening early,” Hunter wrote. “My father will be in New York also and he wants me to attend the Sandy Hook memorial service with him and I would like him to meet you along with my uncle [Jim Biden] and then you and I can talk. Let me know if that works.” Yadong’s response was equally appalling: “No problem,” he replied. “Pls let me know where and when to meet.”

This brazen attempt to exploit a tragedy for personal gain is not just unethical; it is downright reprehensible. The Sandy Hook memorial was intended to be a solemn event to honor the innocent lives lost. Instead, Hunter Biden saw it as an opportunity to advance his and his family’s financial interests, demonstrating a complete lack of respect and moral decency.

The messages revealing this scheme were released by Congress after being obtained from IRS agents investigating Hunter Biden. These documents provide irrefutable evidence of how Hunter Biden used his father’s influence and connections to broker deals with foreign entities, further entangling the Biden family in a web of corruption.

The texts arranging this meeting were just one part of a broader, sinister scheme. For months, the Biden family had been negotiating with the Chinese government-linked company CEFC, seeking a $10 million annual deal. Liu Yadong, a key player in this scheme, helped run CEFC’s sham charity, used by its chief, Patrick Ho, to funnel bribes to foreign officials. Ho was later convicted of bribery in 2018, further underscoring the corrupt nature of these dealings.

In July 2017, Hunter sent threatening messages to CEFC official Runlong Zhao, demanding that he follow through on the $10 million deal and emphasizing his father’s involvement. “I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,” Hunter wrote. This text is a damning piece of evidence showing Joe Biden’s direct involvement in these shady negotiations.

New whistleblower documents released by Congress reveal even more about the Biden family’s corruption. In November 2017, Hunter set up a group text conversation on the encrypted messaging app WhatsApp with his father and uncle, Jim Biden, who was also a partner in the multi-million-dollar deal with CEFC. The messages, marked with contacts labeled “Dad” and “Jim Biden,” show the tight-knit family coordination in these illicit activities. These revelations come from a search warrant on Hunter’s iCloud account, meaning they were obtained directly from his data stored by Apple, not from any abandoned laptop or other physical device, thereby ensuring the authenticity of the evidence.

Hunter Biden’s attempts to downplay his actions as drunken mistakes sent to the wrong person are nothing short of laughable. Phone records show that Hunter Biden sent the message to the correct Chinese businessman, Raymond Zhao, who was indeed affiliated with CEFC and knew exactly what Hunter was talking about.

The fact that Hunter Biden dismissed these incriminating messages under oath as drunken errors further illustrates his contempt for the truth and the rule of law. His behavior is not just a personal failing but a reflection of a broader culture of corruption and deceit that permeates the Biden administration.

These shocking revelations demand a thorough and impartial investigation. The American people deserve transparency and accountability from their leaders. Hunter Biden’s actions, and the involvement of his father and uncle, suggest a serious breach of ethical and possibly legal standards. It’s time for those in power to be held accountable for their actions, and for the truth to come to light. The integrity of our government depends on it.

 

pittsburgh-pa-april-29-2019-former

POLL: Does Joe Biden belong in prison next to his son Hunter?

Continue Reading

Featured

Buttigieg Stammers To Explain Electric Car Fiasco

manchester-nh-april-5-2019-democratic

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has once again found himself in hot water, this time over President Joe Biden’s relentless push for electric vehicles (EVs) and the administration’s abysmal track record in transforming billions of dollars in federal investment into a functional network of charging stations. Buttigieg faced pointed questions during a Sunday interview on CBS News’ “Face The Nation” with host Margaret Brennan, who didn’t shy away from highlighting the administration’s failures.

In a clip played during the interview, former President Donald Trump lambasted Biden’s obsession with electric vehicles: “Do you notice [Biden]’s trying to save the electric vehicle but not the gas-powered, which is the vehicle that everybody wants. They’re going crazy with the electric car, costing us a fortune. We’re spending hundreds of billions of dollars subsidizing a car that nobody wants and nobody’s ever gonna buy.” Trump’s blunt assessment resonated with many Americans who see through the green charade.

Brennan, hardly a conservative firebrand, responded to Trump’s remarks with a simple yet powerful acknowledgment: “He’s not wrong.” Buttigieg, clearly flustered, attempted to defend the administration’s stance, but Brennan was having none of it. “On the purchasing, he’s not. Of the 4 million vehicles purchased, you know what- 269,000 electric vehicles were sold in the US market. It’s up like 2%,” she countered, underscoring the public’s tepid reception to EVs despite massive government subsidies.

The conversation then turned to the staggering $7.5 billion investment from taxpayers in 2021, intended to create a robust charging network for electric vehicles. Astonishingly, this colossal expenditure has resulted in the construction of a mere seven or eight charging stations—a pitiful outcome for a project that Buttigieg is supposed to be overseeing. Brennan rightly pressed Buttigieg on this glaring failure.

Buttigieg’s response was as underwhelming as his performance: he claimed that building charging stations was “really hard” and assured that 500,000 would be built over the next six years. This promise rings hollow, considering the administration’s inability to deliver even ten stations after nearly three years.

This fiasco epitomizes the broader issues with the Biden administration’s approach to energy and transportation. The push for electric vehicles, while noble in theory, has been poorly executed and reflects a profound disconnect from the preferences and needs of everyday Americans. The reality is that most people prefer reliable, affordable gas-powered vehicles over expensive, inconvenient electric ones.

Moreover, the appointment of Pete Buttigieg as Transportation Secretary seems to be more about checking diversity boxes than genuine competence. Buttigieg’s lack of experience in transportation and infrastructure has been glaringly evident throughout his tenure. His inability to effectively manage the EV charging station project is just the latest in a series of missteps and failures that have plagued his time in office.

The American people deserve leaders who are chosen based on merit and expertise, not for the sake of diversity optics. The country cannot afford to waste billions of dollars on ill-conceived projects that deliver little to no tangible benefits. As Buttigieg continues to flounder in his role, it becomes increasingly clear that his appointment was a mistake—one that underscores the incompetence and misguided priorities of the Biden administration.

In conclusion, Pete Buttigieg and the electric vehicle debacle are emblematic of a government out of touch with its citizens, squandering taxpayer dollars on unpopular and poorly managed initiatives. It’s time for a course correction, one that prioritizes the needs and preferences of the American people over ideological crusades and political tokenism. The future of our transportation system and the efficient use of taxpayer money depend on it.

 

POLL: Is Pete Buttigieg incompetent?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Judge Allows Prosecution to Use Hunter Biden’s Infamous Laptop

washington-dc-usa-02282024-hunter-biden1

Hunter Biden’s name has become synonymous with corruption, and for good reason. The son of President Joe Biden embodies the very essence of what’s wrong with our political elite. From dubious business dealings to salacious personal behavior, Hunter Biden’s saga is a testament to the rot at the heart of the Biden family and, by extension, the current administration.

The infamous Hunter Biden laptop story, initially suppressed and dismissed as “Russian disinformation,” has proven to be a goldmine of damning evidence. In 2019, a visibly intoxicated Hunter Biden dropped off three damaged laptops at a Delaware computer repair shop owned by John Paul Mac Isaac. After numerous failed attempts to contact Hunter, Isaac lawfully took possession of one of the laptops. What he found on that laptop would shock the nation: photos, videos, and emails documenting Hunter Biden’s illicit drug use, interactions with prostitutes, and suspicious foreign business dealings.

Despite the Biden camp’s repeated denials, claiming the laptop wasn’t Hunter’s and that the data had been manipulated, a Delaware federal judge recently ruled that jurors in Hunter Biden’s upcoming trial could be shown evidence from this “laptop from hell.” This decision marks a significant turning point, ensuring that the truth about Hunter Biden’s activities will be laid bare.

In September, Hunter Biden was indicted on federal gun charges in Delaware, facing three counts related to his possession of a firearm while using drugs. Despite pleading not guilty, the evidence against him is overwhelming. Jury selection begins on June 3, and jurors will be presented with incontrovertible evidence of his illegal drug use extracted from his laptop.

Hunter Biden’s legal troubles don’t end with the gun charges. He also faces a 9-count indictment in the Central District of California for tax evasion, failure to file/pay taxes, and submitting false/fraudulent tax returns. These charges further underscore the pattern of lawlessness that characterizes Hunter Biden’s life.

It is crucial to remember how the Hunter Biden laptop story was initially handled. The mainstream media and Big Tech companies worked overtime to suppress the story, branding it as Russian disinformation just weeks before the 2020 presidential election. This coordinated effort to bury the truth not only misled the American public but also demonstrated the lengths to which Biden’s allies would go to protect him.

Hunter Biden is not just a troubled individual; he is a symbol of the Democratic Party’s hypocrisy. While the left constantly preaches about accountability and justice, they turn a blind eye to the blatant corruption within their own ranks. Hunter Biden’s actions and the subsequent cover-up efforts exemplify the double standards that have become all too common.

As the trial begins and more evidence comes to light, it becomes increasingly clear that Hunter Biden is the apotheosis of corruption. His actions, coupled with the Biden administration’s attempts to shield him from scrutiny, reveal a disturbing disregard for the rule of law. The American people deserve transparency and justice, and Hunter Biden’s case should serve as a wake-up call about the deep-seated corruption that plagues our political system. It’s time to hold the Bidens accountable and restore integrity to our nation’s highest office.

 

washington-dc-usa-02282024-hunter-biden

POLL: Does Hunter Biden belong in prison?

 

Continue Reading

Trending