Connect with us

Featured

FBI Agent Confirms Authenticity of Hunter Biden’s “Laptop From Hell”

washington-dc-usa-april-1-2024

FBI agent Erika Jensen confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop during the second day of his gun trial on Tuesday, a bombshell revelation that exposes the deep corruption and deceit within the Biden Administration.

The “laptop from hell” story, first reported by Emma-Jo Morris of Breitbart News in October 2020, was immediately dismissed by the mainstream media as “Russian disinformation,” a brazen attempt to bury a legitimate scandal during the critical days leading up to the 2020 election. Despite the overwhelming evidence, the establishment media shamelessly spun the narrative to protect Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.

The Department of Justice has since confirmed the laptop’s authenticity in court filings, with prosecutors calling on Jensen to verify it before the jury, as it is central to the case. The laptop contains a plethora of Whatsapp messages, iMessages, and text messages directly related to Hunter Biden’s activities.

The DOJ verified the laptop’s origin by establishing that Hunter Biden left it at a computer store and that its contents matched data obtained from Hunter’s iCloud via a search warrant, as Breitbart News reported in January. In court, Jensen examined the laptop, sealed in an evidence bag, and detailed the FBI’s authentication process. When she handled the device, Hunter’s wife, Melissa Cohen-Biden, appeared visibly distressed, conversing with Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris, according to court reports.

Hunter’s prosecutor presented an $85 invoice from The Mac Shop as evidence, further confirming the laptop’s authenticity. Jensen stated, “This is the laptop that was recovered from the computer store,” and confirmed its legitimacy by matching its serial number with records provided by Apple Inc. Jensen made a concerted effort to engage the jury while explaining the FBI’s procedure for obtaining iCloud data via warrants. Jurors appeared deeply engaged, with some taking notes, while Hunter Biden, wearing glasses, alternated between taking notes and conferring with his lawyers.

The FBI’s investigation revealed 18,000 pages of messages, photos, and videos from Hunter’s laptop, phone, and tablet, although only 75 pages are relevant to the trial, NBC News reported. Despite the damning evidence, the initial report by the New York Post in 2020 was met with fierce denial from the mainstream media. CNN’s Natasha Bertrand authored a now-discredited Politico story citing “dozens of former intel officials” to propagate a false narrative about the laptop’s origins.

It took the establishment media over a year to admit their egregious mistake. The Washington Post, in March 2022, finally acknowledged the authenticity of Hunter’s communications, after deliberately ignoring the story for 532 days. CNN also confirmed the laptop’s authenticity more than 500 days after the initial report, having previously smeared it as “Russian disinformation” and “made up.”

The New York Times followed suit nearly two years later, validating the authenticity of Hunter’s emails, as reported by Breitbart News. Fifteen media personalities falsely claimed the emails were likely Russian propaganda. Most notably, CBS News reporter Lesley Stahl inaccurately told President Donald Trump in 2020 that the laptop could not be verified.

President Joe Biden and his press secretary, Jen Psaki, perpetuated these lies, making misleading statements about the laptop’s origins. Joe Biden dismissed it as “Russian disinformation” and “a smear campaign,” while Psaki labeled it part of a “broad range of Russian disinformation.”

The case, United States v. Hunter Biden, No. 24-1703, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, epitomizes the depths of corruption and deceit within the Biden Administration and the lengths to which the establishment media will go to protect their favored candidates. The deliberate burying of the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election is a scandal that should outrage every American who values truth and transparency in their government.

 

election-fraud-vote-rigging-concept-thief

POLL: Did the “lamestream media” manipulate the 2020 election results?

 

Featured

Snopes Finally Admits Trump Never Called Nazis “Very Fine People”

national-harbor-md-usa-february-242

The recent update from Snopes has ignited a firestorm of outrage among conservatives, who have long decried the deceitful narratives perpetuated by the left. For years, former President Trump was smeared as a Nazi sympathizer, with his comments following the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally twisted and distorted beyond recognition. This grotesque misrepresentation has finally been acknowledged by the left-leaning fact-checker, Snopes, which admitted on Saturday that Trump never called neo-Nazis “very fine people.”

This admission, long overdue, came after relentless scrutiny and pressure. The acknowledgment reveals the pernicious and intentional mischaracterization by Trump’s critics, including President Biden. Biden, in particular, seized upon this fabricated narrative as a cornerstone of his 2020 campaign, launching his bid for the presidency on the false premise that Trump equated neo-Nazis with counterprotesters. This deceitful rhetoric has not only tarnished Trump’s reputation but has also misled millions of Americans.

Snopes’ fact-check clarifies that while Trump did say there were “very fine people on both sides,” he explicitly condemned neo-Nazis and White supremacists, stating they should be “condemned totally.” This correction aligns with what Trump’s supporters have maintained from the beginning, backed by clear transcripts and video evidence that his comments were grossly taken out of context.

The false claim that Trump praised neo-Nazis was weaponized by the left, spreading like wildfire and becoming a bedrock of Biden’s campaign. This egregious lie was repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream media and left-wing politicians, further entrenching the false narrative in the public’s mind. The updated fact-check from Snopes dismantles a critical piece of Biden’s rhetoric just days before his first debate with Trump. It exposes the left’s shameless reliance on misinformation and underscores their persistent attempts to undermine Trump through baseless fabrications.

The damage done by this malicious lie cannot be overstated. For years, Trump and his supporters have been vilified and slandered as racists and Nazi sympathizers. This narrative has fueled division and hatred, tearing at the fabric of our nation. It is a testament to the lengths the left will go to achieve their political ends, even if it means perpetuating outright falsehoods.

In preparation for the upcoming debate, Biden has retreated to Camp David, presumably to concoct more deceitful narratives, while Trump remains active on the campaign trail, ready to confront these deceptive tactics head-on in Atlanta. This correction from Snopes marks a significant moment in revealing the truth and holding the left accountable for their obfuscation and lies.

The conservative outrage is palpable. How many more lies have been told? How many more truths have been buried under the weight of leftist propaganda? The American people deserve better than to be manipulated by falsehoods and deceit. This moment should serve as a wake-up call to all who value truth and integrity in our political discourse. It’s time to hold the purveyors of these lies accountable and demand a higher standard of honesty and fairness in our media and political institutions. The truth matters, and it’s high time it prevails.

 

former-president-donald-trump-jr-speaks

POLL: Is Snopes a left-wing smear merchant?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Mob of Jew Haters Attacks Los Angeles Synagogue

san-francisco-ca-october-09-2023

In an egregious display of antisemitic mob violence, several dozen pro-Palestinian activists targeted an Orthodox Jewish synagogue in the heart of the Pico-Robertson neighborhood on Sunday. The protesters blocked the entrance to an event promoting real estate investment in Israel, a move that has sparked outrage within the Jewish community and among supporters of Israel.

Eyewitness reports indicate that these leftist activists were obstructing pedestrians on the south side of Pico Boulevard, the main thoroughfare in this predominantly Orthodox Jewish area of west Los Angeles. This blatant act of intimidation, carried out by a mob driven by hatred, took place outside a sacred place of worship, highlighting a disturbing trend of rising antisemitism within leftist circles.

The Forward, a left-wing Jewish publication, indicated that the protest aimed at the synagogue was partly due to an event within the Jewish community that promoted Israeli real estate for purposes such as emigration, vacation, or investment. This targeting of Jewish spaces and events is not just an attack on individual property but an assault on the Jewish way of life and the right to support and connect with Israel. It is an outrageous demonstration of the growing antisemitism that is taking root among leftist activists in America.

Since the horrific events of October 7, there has been a worldwide surge among Jews applying to emigrate to Israel — an act known as making aliyah, or “ascent.” This increase is driven by a sense of solidarity with Israel and a response to rising local antisemitism. The targeting of these community events by a hateful mob is a direct affront to these expressions of unity and resilience.

Sunday’s incident marks the second time in recent days that pro-Palestinian activists have targeted Jewish institutions in Los Angeles. Just this past Friday, another synagogue and school in the Valley Village area were besieged by protesters for reasons that remain unclear. This pattern of aggression reveals a sinister undercurrent of hostility towards Jews and their places of worship, orchestrated by a radical leftist mob.

These acts of antisemitic violence and intimidation are not isolated incidents but part of a broader, alarming trend. They reflect a dangerous escalation in hostility that must be condemned unequivocally. The Jewish community, and indeed all communities, deserve to live in peace without fear of being targeted for their beliefs and affiliations. The silence from the broader left on these incidents is deafening and unacceptable.

This wave of protests against synagogues is a stark reminder of the persistent and pernicious nature of antisemitism. It is imperative that we recognize these actions for what they are: not just protests, but targeted attacks on Jewish people and their right to practice their faith freely. The community must stand united against such bigotry and ensure that those responsible are held accountable. The rise in antisemitism among the left in America is a dire threat that must be addressed head-on.

As the Jewish community in Los Angeles and around the world continues to show solidarity with Israel, it is essential that they receive support and protection against these violent demonstrations. The right to support Israel, to engage in investment opportunities, and to gather in places of worship must be defended against those who seek to intimidate and harm.

This situation calls for a strong response from law enforcement and community leaders to protect Jewish institutions and to send a clear message that antisemitic violence will not be tolerated. The safety and security of the Jewish community must be a priority, and the rights of Jews to live and worship freely must be upheld against all forms of hatred and bigotry. The growing antisemitism among leftist groups in America is a serious concern that requires immediate and decisive action.

 

new-york-united-states-may-15-

POLL: Is the American left increasingly antisemitic?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Growing Concerns Among Liberals About Biden’s Brain

washington-dc-usa-02202024-biden-talks

It’s not just Republicans and Trump supporters who are raising alarms about President Biden’s mental fitness. Even some anti-Trump pundits, mainstream media outlets, and longtime Democrats have expressed serious concerns recently, painting a grim picture of a leader who may no longer be up to the job.

Billionaire Bill Ackman, a significant Democratic donor, highlighted a troubling video where former President Obama appeared to guide Biden off the stage during a campaign event. Ackman drew a stark comparison between Biden and Warren Buffett, stating, “Some people are old at 81 and others are sharp, vigorous, and impressive. Compare Warren Buffett at 93 and Biden at 81. Biden is an old 81 who can’t find his way off a stage or stay present and focused at a G7 conference. Is that who should be the leader of the free world for the next five years?” Ackman emphasized that a president should not need to be led off stage, calling it a concerning image of weakness and lack of leadership that the country cannot afford.

Ackman continued by blaming perceived weak leadership for global instability, arguing that the Democratic Party is harming itself by pushing Biden for a second term. He warned that Biden’s potential re-election poses a grave threat to global security and prosperity. This sentiment reflects a growing unease about whether Biden can effectively manage the responsibilities of the presidency at his advanced age.

The issue of Biden’s age has become a national concern as he seeks re-election at 81. In a recent appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” progressive journalist Cenk Uygur criticized Democrats for ignoring Biden’s mental fitness issues, pointing out, “We do all have eyes and ears.” Uygur highlighted the risk of Biden becoming more stubborn if he has dementia and questioned whether Biden’s mental state might be affecting his decision-making. His stark assessment reflects a broader anxiety about Biden’s capacity to lead the nation during such turbulent times.

The Biden administration has been defensive against reports of the president’s cognitive decline, despite polls indicating widespread concern among Americans, including 73 percent of Democrats who, in February, said Biden was too old to serve. The Department of Justice’s special counsel described Biden as an “elderly man with a poor memory” during an investigation into his handling of classified documents, a characterization that ultimately helped him avoid charges. Such official assessments only add to the growing doubt about Biden’s mental acuity.

The Wall Street Journal, after interviewing 45 individuals, reported that Biden “appears slower now” and has “good moments and bad ones.” This report received strong pushback from the White House, which dismissed it as a partisan attack. Yet, it’s not just Republicans making these claims. Former Obama adviser David Axelrod has acknowledged that Biden’s age and mental fitness are significant problems for his presidency. Axelrod’s comments underscore the seriousness of the situation and the potential implications for the country.

At 81, Biden is the oldest sitting president, and critics argue that his cognitive decline is evident through frequent gaffes and memory lapses. Liberal comedian Jon Stewart, a critic of Trump, recently stated that Biden “shouldn’t be president” due to his age. Billionaire Mark Cuban also noted that both Biden and Trump are prone to senior moments and physical frailties. These comments from prominent figures across the political spectrum highlight a deepening concern about Biden’s ability to perform his duties effectively.

Media figures like “The View” co-host Sara Haines and Alyssa Farah Griffin have voiced concerns about Biden’s age and cognitive state, suggesting that voters shouldn’t be told to ignore these issues. Griffin even proposed that Vice President Harris could step in as a more viable candidate. The idea that Biden might need to be replaced mid-term due to his mental decline is a stark and worrying prospect.

Liberal comedian Bill Maher has called for Democrats to reconsider Biden’s candidacy, warning that Biden risks becoming the “Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the presidency” by staying in office too long. Maher suggested that Biden should embrace his age rather than deny it, but his comments also reflect a broader anxiety about the president’s capacity to lead.

Media mogul Charlamagne tha God has also questioned Biden’s vigor, adding to the growing chorus of concerns about the president’s ability to lead. The perception of a frail and mentally declining president is not just a Republican talking point; it is a growing concern that spans the political spectrum.

Even traditionally liberal outlets have highlighted these issues. The New York Times published a story featuring former Biden supporters who now plan to vote for Trump due to Biden’s perceived cognitive issues. The Atlantic’s Mark Leibovich described Biden’s candidacy as “existentially risky, perhaps disastrous,” arguing that Biden remains a weak incumbent burdened by his age. This widespread concern about Biden’s cognitive decline raises serious questions about the future of his presidency and the direction of the country.

 

11 U.S. Souls Lost in Israel; Where's Biden's Outrage?!

POLL: Is Biden mentally fit to be President?

 

Continue Reading

Trending