Connect with us


Chicago Cop Sues City to Change His Race


In a baffling twist of identity politics gone awry, the saga of Mohammad Yusuf, a Chicago police officer, unfolds like a farcical drama on the stage of political correctness run amok. At 43 years old, Yusuf has apparently decided to embark on a journey of self-discovery, one that leads him to disavow his previous racial classification of “Caucasian” in favor of identifying as Egyptian and African American. It’s a head-scratching revelation that would seem more at home in a satirical sketch than in the annals of reality.

Yet, Yusuf’s quest for self-redefinition hits a roadblock when the Chicago Police Department, in a stunning display of selective adherence to progressive ideology, draws a line in the sand: gender can be fluid, but race, it seems, remains immutable. While officers are granted the liberty to freely amend their gender identities to align with their subjective experiences, Yusuf finds himself thwarted in his attempts to alter his racial designation.

The irony is palpable. In an era where the societal pendulum swings ever closer to the altar of inclusivity and diversity, Yusuf’s predicament stands as a testament to the absurdity of the very system purportedly designed to champion such ideals. As the department embraces the fluidity of gender, it clings tightly to the rigidity of racial categorization, leaving Yusuf caught in a perplexing limbo of identity.

But the ramifications of this bureaucratic quagmire extend beyond mere existential ponderings. Yusuf contends that his professional trajectory has been stymied by his continued classification as “Caucasian.” In a workplace landscape where the currency of advancement appears to be diversity quotas rather than meritocracy, Yusuf laments being left in the wake of his minority counterparts, who seemingly enjoy preferential treatment in the pursuit of career advancement.

Yet, the plot thickens. Yusuf, a seasoned veteran of two decades within the Chicago Police Department, asserts that the promotion system itself is tainted by racial bias. Despite his commendable performance on promotional exams, he alleges that the scales are tipped in favor of minority candidates, regardless of their qualifications. In this topsy-turvy world, where the meritocracy once reigned supreme, Yusuf finds himself navigating a labyrinth of racial politics in pursuit of professional recognition.

Undeterred by the department’s obstinacy, Yusuf embarks on a crusade for justice, wielding the weapon of litigation in his quest to rectify what he perceives as a grave injustice. Armed with a DNA test to substantiate his newfound racial identity, he confronts the bureaucratic machinery that stands between him and his desired reclassification. Yet, even in the face of incontrovertible evidence, the department remains steadfast in its refusal to acquiesce to Yusuf’s plea for recognition.

As the legal battle ensues, Yusuf invokes the hallowed halls of the Civil Rights Act, alleging violations of its sacred tenets. In a startling indictment of the very system purportedly erected to safeguard against discrimination, Yusuf finds himself cast as both victim and plaintiff in a courtroom drama that underscores the surreal nature of contemporary societal norms.

In a world where the lines between reality and satire blur with alarming frequency, Yusuf’s plight serves as a cautionary tale, a poignant reminder of the perils inherent in the unchecked proliferation of identity politics. As the pendulum swings ever closer to the precipice of absurdity, one can only hope that sanity prevails and that the pursuit of genuine equality transcends the trappings of superficial categorization.

If you can change your sex can you change your race? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 


Continue Reading


Ukraine Betrayal Bill Funds Migrant Invasion of America


In an egregious betrayal of American values and security, President Joe Biden and his Democrat enablers have once again demonstrated their contempt for the citizens they were elected to serve. The latest affront is a colossal spending package—ostensibly for infrastructure improvements—but buried within its overwrought pages lies a sinister objective: the acceleration of mass migration that threatens to dilute the American way of life.

Billed as an investment in America’s future, this behemoth $1 trillion package is anything but. Hidden amid legitimate allocations for roads and bridges are billions earmarked to facilitate and encourage the influx of migrants into the heartland of America, all under the guise of “diversifying” rural communities and filling labor shortages engineered by the Democrats’ own anti-business policies.

Biden’s duplicity is clear. While feigning concern for the crumbling infrastructure of our nation, he cleverly disguises a Trojan horse aimed at importing a dependent voting bloc that will secure Democrat dominance for generations. This is not just policy—it’s political warfare against the American people.

Under the sprawling shadow of this bill, $500 million is set aside not for improving the lives of current citizens but for expanding “refugee resettlement services” in small towns and rural areas. These areas, historically bastions of conservative values and American traditions, are specifically targeted for demographic upheaval, altering their electoral landscapes permanently.

Furthermore, the bill generously allocates $750 million to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that specialize in the transportation, housing, and integration of migrants into American society. These NGOs, many with questionable agendas and shadowy funding sources, act as the ground troops in the Democrats’ assault on American sovereignty. They are the facilitators of chaos, eagerly eroding national borders under the banner of globalist ideology.

Adding insult to injury, while our southern border remains a lawless frontier, Biden has the audacity to fund security enhancements—for other nations. Included in the package is a staggering $200 million to improve border infrastructure and technology in strategic international crossings not on our soil, but abroad. This is a slap in the face to every American citizen who has called for stronger national security and a secure border.

Biden’s strategy is painfully transparent. By weakening American cultural and economic stability through enforced diversity and labor competition, he aims to cripple the traditional values that have been the backbone of this nation. The message from the White House is unmistakable: American citizens are no longer the priority. The focus has shifted to those who have not contributed to the building of this nation, nor have they fought for its principles.

This policy move is not just misguided—it is downright dangerous. It places the welfare of potential migrants over the safety and economic health of American families. It is a policy of displacement and replacement, a clear continuation of the Democrats’ anti-American agenda.

It is incumbent upon every patriotic American to recognize this deceit and mobilize against it. We must demand accountability and transparency from those in power. We must insist that our government halt these reckless immigration policies and focus instead on securing our borders and putting American citizens first. If we fail to act, we will witness the systematic dismantling of the country we love—a country built on law, order, and the promise of the American Dream for those who are legally part of it.

Now is the time to stand firm, to raise our voices in unison against the erosion of our national identity and sovereignty. We must protect the legacy we hold dear and ensure that America remains for Americans. The battle lines are drawn; let us not be found wanting in the defense of our homeland.


Biden Admin Threatens to Stop Weapon Supplies to Israel

POLL: Is Joe Biden trying to destroy America?


Continue Reading


Antisemitic Woke Mob at Columbia Threatens Jewish Students’ Safety


In a decisive and heartfelt appeal aimed at safeguarding the well-being of Jewish students amidst growing tensions, Rabbi Elie Buechler, the esteemed Orthodox rabbi at Columbia University and Barnard College, has issued a resolute recommendation for Jewish students to consider leaving campus temporarily. Rabbi Buechler, who serves as the director of OU-LJIC at Columbia/Barnard, conveyed his profound concern through a carefully crafted message distributed via WhatsApp to hundreds of students, particularly timed before the observance of Passover.

Expressing deep anguish over the recent developments, Rabbi Buechler emphasized the gravity of the situation unfolding in and around the university campus. He underscored the inability of Columbia University’s Public Safety and the New York City Police Department to provide adequate assurance of safety in the face of escalating incidents of antisemitism and lawlessness perpetrated by anti-Israel agitators.

The rabbi’s message urged students to prioritize their safety and well-being by considering a temporary departure from campus until a significant improvement in the prevailing circumstances is observed.

The decision to issue such a recommendation was not made lightly but was born out of a profound sense of responsibility and care for the Jewish students under his guidance. Rabbi Buechler’s words reflect a deep-rooted concern for the welfare of the student community, recognizing the distressing reality of being subjected to hatred and threats while pursuing their education.

The anti-Israel encampment, which has become a focal point of concern, has witnessed a disturbing escalation in rhetoric and actions aimed at vilifying and targeting Jewish students. This alarming trend has prompted widespread condemnation from various quarters, especially Republican lawmakers and conservative voices, who have raised serious questions about the university’s commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of all its students.

The resonance of Rabbi Buechler’s message underscores the urgent need for decisive action to address the underlying issues fueling the rise of antisemitism and extremism on campus. It serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of fostering a campus environment that is inclusive, tolerant, and safe for all students, regardless of their religious or ideological beliefs.

In light of these developments, the call to prioritize safety and well-being resonates not only as a practical measure but also as a profound statement of solidarity and support for the Jewish community at Columbia University and beyond. It is a reminder that the pursuit of education should never come at the cost of one’s safety or dignity and that every student deserves to learn and thrive in an environment free from fear and intimidation.

It is also a reminder of the consequences of the vocal and virulent anti-Semitism now currently in vogue among Joe Biden’s hard left base.

POLL: Are Jewish students in danger at Columbia?


Continue Reading


Radical Dems Go to Bat for Traitor Johnson Over Ukraine


In a recent appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) sparked controversy with his unexpected declaration of support for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), despite glaring ideological disparities. Khanna’s surprising endorsement emerged in the aftermath of Speaker Johnson’s contentious facilitation of a foreign aid package, which included provisions for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, and passed through Congress under his guidance.

During his conversation with host Jonathan Karl, Khanna’s remarks seemed to laud Speaker Johnson’s leadership, citing vague notions of civility and procedural fairness. However, this endorsement from a Democratic representative inevitably raises doubts about Speaker Johnson’s commitment to conservative principles and his integrity as a leader within the conservative movement.

Conservative circles have traditionally approached issues of foreign aid with caution, particularly when it involves nations like Ukraine, and have advocated for a policy of non-interventionism. Speaker Johnson’s forceful promotion of such a package, seemingly at odds with these foundational conservative beliefs, inevitably begs the question of his fidelity to the conservative cause and his willingness to compromise on core values for political expediency.

Khanna’s unexpected alignment with Speaker Johnson exposes a troubling trend within conservative leadership, where the steadfast commitment to conservative principles is often sacrificed in pursuit of personal ambition and political pragmatism. By throwing his support behind Speaker Johnson, Khanna inadvertently highlights the erosion of conservative values within the movement and the growing influence of moderate voices willing to dilute conservative principles for the sake of compromise.

As the debate over Speaker Johnson’s future continues, Khanna’s endorsement serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges facing the conservative movement, torn between its ideological roots and the allure of centrist compromise. Whether Speaker Johnson’s actions will have lasting repercussions for conservative leadership remains uncertain, but Khanna’s endorsement has undoubtedly reignited a fierce debate over the movement’s identity and its commitment to upholding conservative values amidst internal discord and external pressures.



POLL: Is Speaker Mike Johnson a traitor to America?


Continue Reading