Connect with us

Featured

Biden Pushes to Amnesty 350,000 Illegal Migrant Invaders

october-10-2021-migrant-women-men

The Biden administration is playing a dangerous game with our nation’s security by quietly operating what can only be described as a “mass amnesty” program for migrants. Behind the scenes, while publicly pretending to take a tough stance on border security, the administration has been closing more than 350,000 asylum cases since 2022, allowing migrants to stay indefinitely in the United States without fear of deportation.

Data reveals that these cases are being terminated without a decision on the merits of the asylum claims, effectively letting these individuals slip through the cracks of our legal system. They are no longer required to check in with authorities, meaning they can roam freely across the country. This is not immigration management; it’s an outright abandonment of immigration law.

“This is just a massive amnesty under the guise of prosecutorial discretion,” says Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge now with the Center for Immigration Studies. His statement highlights the deep concern among conservatives that the Biden administration is prioritizing illegal migrants over the security and well-being of American citizens.

Under the Trump administration in 2020, the immigration courts ordered the removal of 48,000 migrants. Contrast that with the Biden administration’s record: in 2022 alone, a staggering 102,550 cases were dismissed or taken off the books. This number jumped to 149,000 in 2023, and the trend continues upward. This alarming increase signals a clear policy of leniency and a de facto amnesty for those who have entered the country illegally.

The implications of this policy are dire. ICE officers have noted an increase in crimes committed by these migrants after their asylum cases were dismissed. This forces ICE to restart removal proceedings, which can take years, during which time these individuals remain in our communities. An ICE officer, speaking anonymously, urged, “Please let everyone know what’s really going on.”

In 2022, an ICE memo directed prosecutors to dismiss cases for migrants not deemed national security threats. This policy shift has resulted in a massive increase in dismissed cases, far surpassing previous years. Since Biden took office, a shocking 77% of asylum seekers have been allowed to remain in the country, equating to 499,000 out of 648,000 applicants.

The backlog of asylum cases now stands at 3.5 million. By dismissing over 100,000 cases annually, the administration is artificially reducing this backlog, creating an illusion of efficiency while undermining the rule of law. Once their cases are dismissed, these migrants are no longer monitored by ICE, effectively disappearing from any legal oversight.

This is not just a failure of policy; it is a deliberate strategy to flood the country with illegal migrants, changing the demographic and political landscape of the United States. The administration’s actions are a slap in the face to every American who believes in law and order, and to every legal immigrant who followed the proper channels to be here.

The Biden administration’s approach to immigration is not just about compassion; it is about fundamentally transforming America through mass migration and unchecked leniency. This must be stopped to preserve the integrity and security of our nation. The American people deserve a government that puts their safety and interests first, not one that caters to illegal migrants at the expense of national security.

 

Illegals Get the VIP Treatment from Biden's DHS!

POLL: Is the Biden Regime trying to destroy America with mass migration?

 

Featured

Snopes Finally Admits Trump Never Called Nazis “Very Fine People”

national-harbor-md-usa-february-242

The recent update from Snopes has ignited a firestorm of outrage among conservatives, who have long decried the deceitful narratives perpetuated by the left. For years, former President Trump was smeared as a Nazi sympathizer, with his comments following the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally twisted and distorted beyond recognition. This grotesque misrepresentation has finally been acknowledged by the left-leaning fact-checker, Snopes, which admitted on Saturday that Trump never called neo-Nazis “very fine people.”

This admission, long overdue, came after relentless scrutiny and pressure. The acknowledgment reveals the pernicious and intentional mischaracterization by Trump’s critics, including President Biden. Biden, in particular, seized upon this fabricated narrative as a cornerstone of his 2020 campaign, launching his bid for the presidency on the false premise that Trump equated neo-Nazis with counterprotesters. This deceitful rhetoric has not only tarnished Trump’s reputation but has also misled millions of Americans.

Snopes’ fact-check clarifies that while Trump did say there were “very fine people on both sides,” he explicitly condemned neo-Nazis and White supremacists, stating they should be “condemned totally.” This correction aligns with what Trump’s supporters have maintained from the beginning, backed by clear transcripts and video evidence that his comments were grossly taken out of context.

The false claim that Trump praised neo-Nazis was weaponized by the left, spreading like wildfire and becoming a bedrock of Biden’s campaign. This egregious lie was repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream media and left-wing politicians, further entrenching the false narrative in the public’s mind. The updated fact-check from Snopes dismantles a critical piece of Biden’s rhetoric just days before his first debate with Trump. It exposes the left’s shameless reliance on misinformation and underscores their persistent attempts to undermine Trump through baseless fabrications.

The damage done by this malicious lie cannot be overstated. For years, Trump and his supporters have been vilified and slandered as racists and Nazi sympathizers. This narrative has fueled division and hatred, tearing at the fabric of our nation. It is a testament to the lengths the left will go to achieve their political ends, even if it means perpetuating outright falsehoods.

In preparation for the upcoming debate, Biden has retreated to Camp David, presumably to concoct more deceitful narratives, while Trump remains active on the campaign trail, ready to confront these deceptive tactics head-on in Atlanta. This correction from Snopes marks a significant moment in revealing the truth and holding the left accountable for their obfuscation and lies.

The conservative outrage is palpable. How many more lies have been told? How many more truths have been buried under the weight of leftist propaganda? The American people deserve better than to be manipulated by falsehoods and deceit. This moment should serve as a wake-up call to all who value truth and integrity in our political discourse. It’s time to hold the purveyors of these lies accountable and demand a higher standard of honesty and fairness in our media and political institutions. The truth matters, and it’s high time it prevails.

 

former-president-donald-trump-jr-speaks

POLL: Is Snopes a left-wing smear merchant?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Mob of Jew Haters Attacks Los Angeles Synagogue

san-francisco-ca-october-09-2023

In an egregious display of antisemitic mob violence, several dozen pro-Palestinian activists targeted an Orthodox Jewish synagogue in the heart of the Pico-Robertson neighborhood on Sunday. The protesters blocked the entrance to an event promoting real estate investment in Israel, a move that has sparked outrage within the Jewish community and among supporters of Israel.

Eyewitness reports indicate that these leftist activists were obstructing pedestrians on the south side of Pico Boulevard, the main thoroughfare in this predominantly Orthodox Jewish area of west Los Angeles. This blatant act of intimidation, carried out by a mob driven by hatred, took place outside a sacred place of worship, highlighting a disturbing trend of rising antisemitism within leftist circles.

The Forward, a left-wing Jewish publication, indicated that the protest aimed at the synagogue was partly due to an event within the Jewish community that promoted Israeli real estate for purposes such as emigration, vacation, or investment. This targeting of Jewish spaces and events is not just an attack on individual property but an assault on the Jewish way of life and the right to support and connect with Israel. It is an outrageous demonstration of the growing antisemitism that is taking root among leftist activists in America.

Since the horrific events of October 7, there has been a worldwide surge among Jews applying to emigrate to Israel — an act known as making aliyah, or “ascent.” This increase is driven by a sense of solidarity with Israel and a response to rising local antisemitism. The targeting of these community events by a hateful mob is a direct affront to these expressions of unity and resilience.

Sunday’s incident marks the second time in recent days that pro-Palestinian activists have targeted Jewish institutions in Los Angeles. Just this past Friday, another synagogue and school in the Valley Village area were besieged by protesters for reasons that remain unclear. This pattern of aggression reveals a sinister undercurrent of hostility towards Jews and their places of worship, orchestrated by a radical leftist mob.

These acts of antisemitic violence and intimidation are not isolated incidents but part of a broader, alarming trend. They reflect a dangerous escalation in hostility that must be condemned unequivocally. The Jewish community, and indeed all communities, deserve to live in peace without fear of being targeted for their beliefs and affiliations. The silence from the broader left on these incidents is deafening and unacceptable.

This wave of protests against synagogues is a stark reminder of the persistent and pernicious nature of antisemitism. It is imperative that we recognize these actions for what they are: not just protests, but targeted attacks on Jewish people and their right to practice their faith freely. The community must stand united against such bigotry and ensure that those responsible are held accountable. The rise in antisemitism among the left in America is a dire threat that must be addressed head-on.

As the Jewish community in Los Angeles and around the world continues to show solidarity with Israel, it is essential that they receive support and protection against these violent demonstrations. The right to support Israel, to engage in investment opportunities, and to gather in places of worship must be defended against those who seek to intimidate and harm.

This situation calls for a strong response from law enforcement and community leaders to protect Jewish institutions and to send a clear message that antisemitic violence will not be tolerated. The safety and security of the Jewish community must be a priority, and the rights of Jews to live and worship freely must be upheld against all forms of hatred and bigotry. The growing antisemitism among leftist groups in America is a serious concern that requires immediate and decisive action.

 

new-york-united-states-may-15-

POLL: Is the American left increasingly antisemitic?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Growing Concerns Among Liberals About Biden’s Brain

washington-dc-usa-02202024-biden-talks

It’s not just Republicans and Trump supporters who are raising alarms about President Biden’s mental fitness. Even some anti-Trump pundits, mainstream media outlets, and longtime Democrats have expressed serious concerns recently, painting a grim picture of a leader who may no longer be up to the job.

Billionaire Bill Ackman, a significant Democratic donor, highlighted a troubling video where former President Obama appeared to guide Biden off the stage during a campaign event. Ackman drew a stark comparison between Biden and Warren Buffett, stating, “Some people are old at 81 and others are sharp, vigorous, and impressive. Compare Warren Buffett at 93 and Biden at 81. Biden is an old 81 who can’t find his way off a stage or stay present and focused at a G7 conference. Is that who should be the leader of the free world for the next five years?” Ackman emphasized that a president should not need to be led off stage, calling it a concerning image of weakness and lack of leadership that the country cannot afford.

Ackman continued by blaming perceived weak leadership for global instability, arguing that the Democratic Party is harming itself by pushing Biden for a second term. He warned that Biden’s potential re-election poses a grave threat to global security and prosperity. This sentiment reflects a growing unease about whether Biden can effectively manage the responsibilities of the presidency at his advanced age.

The issue of Biden’s age has become a national concern as he seeks re-election at 81. In a recent appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” progressive journalist Cenk Uygur criticized Democrats for ignoring Biden’s mental fitness issues, pointing out, “We do all have eyes and ears.” Uygur highlighted the risk of Biden becoming more stubborn if he has dementia and questioned whether Biden’s mental state might be affecting his decision-making. His stark assessment reflects a broader anxiety about Biden’s capacity to lead the nation during such turbulent times.

The Biden administration has been defensive against reports of the president’s cognitive decline, despite polls indicating widespread concern among Americans, including 73 percent of Democrats who, in February, said Biden was too old to serve. The Department of Justice’s special counsel described Biden as an “elderly man with a poor memory” during an investigation into his handling of classified documents, a characterization that ultimately helped him avoid charges. Such official assessments only add to the growing doubt about Biden’s mental acuity.

The Wall Street Journal, after interviewing 45 individuals, reported that Biden “appears slower now” and has “good moments and bad ones.” This report received strong pushback from the White House, which dismissed it as a partisan attack. Yet, it’s not just Republicans making these claims. Former Obama adviser David Axelrod has acknowledged that Biden’s age and mental fitness are significant problems for his presidency. Axelrod’s comments underscore the seriousness of the situation and the potential implications for the country.

At 81, Biden is the oldest sitting president, and critics argue that his cognitive decline is evident through frequent gaffes and memory lapses. Liberal comedian Jon Stewart, a critic of Trump, recently stated that Biden “shouldn’t be president” due to his age. Billionaire Mark Cuban also noted that both Biden and Trump are prone to senior moments and physical frailties. These comments from prominent figures across the political spectrum highlight a deepening concern about Biden’s ability to perform his duties effectively.

Media figures like “The View” co-host Sara Haines and Alyssa Farah Griffin have voiced concerns about Biden’s age and cognitive state, suggesting that voters shouldn’t be told to ignore these issues. Griffin even proposed that Vice President Harris could step in as a more viable candidate. The idea that Biden might need to be replaced mid-term due to his mental decline is a stark and worrying prospect.

Liberal comedian Bill Maher has called for Democrats to reconsider Biden’s candidacy, warning that Biden risks becoming the “Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the presidency” by staying in office too long. Maher suggested that Biden should embrace his age rather than deny it, but his comments also reflect a broader anxiety about the president’s capacity to lead.

Media mogul Charlamagne tha God has also questioned Biden’s vigor, adding to the growing chorus of concerns about the president’s ability to lead. The perception of a frail and mentally declining president is not just a Republican talking point; it is a growing concern that spans the political spectrum.

Even traditionally liberal outlets have highlighted these issues. The New York Times published a story featuring former Biden supporters who now plan to vote for Trump due to Biden’s perceived cognitive issues. The Atlantic’s Mark Leibovich described Biden’s candidacy as “existentially risky, perhaps disastrous,” arguing that Biden remains a weak incumbent burdened by his age. This widespread concern about Biden’s cognitive decline raises serious questions about the future of his presidency and the direction of the country.

 

11 U.S. Souls Lost in Israel; Where's Biden's Outrage?!

POLL: Is Biden mentally fit to be President?

 

Continue Reading

Trending