Connect with us

Featured

Biden Courts Michigan Muslim Vote With Israel Bashing

President Joe Biden’s latest executive order, issued under the guise of targeting “extremist settler violence” in the West Bank, is facing fierce criticism for its broad and questionable terms that could potentially lead to sanctions on Israeli elected leaders and political parties. This move comes at a time when Biden is desperately trying to maintain support from Arab- and Muslim-American voters in Michigan, who have voiced their discontent over his perceived bias towards Israel in the ongoing conflict with Hamas.

Despite claims made in the executive order about escalating violence by Jewish Israeli settlers, analysts and experts, including David Weinberg from the Jewish News Syndicate, argue that such allegations are nothing more than a distortion of reality. Weinberg asserts, “The frenzied focus on ‘settler terrorism’ by the highest officials in Washington is based on fake news.” In fact, the overall level of friction and violence in 2023 remains on par with that of the previous year, totaling about 1,000 instances of violence of all types.

The executive order, conspicuously lacking any factual basis or evidentiary record, appears to be a thinly veiled attempt to placate anti-Israel factions within the Democratic Party. Critics argue that these accusations of “extremist settler violence” are being used to offset the justified condemnation of Palestinian terrorism.

While the majority of Israeli settlers are described as peaceful citizens, the sweeping language of the executive order raises concerns about its potential application to non-violent individuals. It permits sanctions on anyone even remotely associated with those accused of violence, including lawyers or advocates for accused settlers. Additionally, the order allows the president to sanction any “entity” with members who are sanctioned, potentially enabling the U.S. to target political parties or leaders within the Israeli government.

Despite assurances from the White House’s national security spokesman, John Kirby, that there are no current sanctions on Israeli leaders, the door remains open for future actions. Critics argue that this executive order is just another example of the Biden administration’s troubling approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding its handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), with its questionable history, has wasted no time in capitalizing on this executive order. CAIR, once named an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror financing trial and labeled a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates, has called on the Biden administration to sanction right-wing members of the Israeli government. This raises concerns about the influence of organizations with questionable ties on U.S. foreign policy decisions.

The timing of this executive order is suspect, as the U.S. is pushing Israel to accept a Palestinian state despite the recent wave of terrorism orchestrated by Hamas. Critics argue that such a move would be a misguided reward for acts of violence, undermining Israel’s efforts to secure its citizens from ongoing threats.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in response to the executive order, emphasized that the majority of residents in Judea and Samaria are law-abiding citizens. He questioned the need for exceptional measures, stating that Israel already takes action against those who break the law.

The first individuals to face sanctions, as reported by The Times of Israel, include David Chai Chasdai, Eitan Tanjil, Shalom Zicherman, and Yinon Levi. The accusations against them range from leading violent rampages to assaulting farmers and activists. As tensions rise and the Biden administration’s questionable approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict unfolds, doubts linger about the impact of such policies on the longstanding diplomatic relations between the United States and Israel.

 

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Is Biden’s Brain Tapioca? One Tennessee Republican Thinks So

washington-dc-usa-january-31-2024

The White House would be required to notify Congress whenever the president takes a drug that could impact his alertness, judgment, or mood, under a new bill proposed by Tennessee Republican Rep. Andy Ogles.

“Joe Biden’s embarrassing outbursts of anger and incomprehensible speeches mirror the incalculable damage his policies have inflicted on our nation,” Rep. Ogles stated.

“Frequently slurred speech, abnormally long pauses, and the inability to string together five coherent words have put Biden’s mental and physical decline on full display,” he said. “It is unfair to the American people for the White House to be occupied by someone who is literally incapable of speaking.”

Ogles introduced his bill — the No Juicing Joe Act — because the White House “has refused” to test President Biden’s cognitive abilities “because they know he will fail miserably.” Biden is scheduled to debate former President Trump, the GOP nominee, later this month.

Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., introduced the No Juicing Joe Act, citing historical precedents where presidential health issues affected their duties. He pointed to President John F. Kennedy’s treatment by Dr. Max Jacobson, known as “Doctor Feelgood,” and Woodrow Wilson’s post-stroke incapacitation, which led to the 21st Amendment.

“The president, whose office is the most powerful on earth, must be accountable to the people, and it’s Congress’s duty to ensure accountability,” Ogles said.

In response, a White House spokesperson claimed that criticisms of Biden’s cognitive state were politically motivated. However, the growing number of incidents raises serious concerns. After losing numerous negotiations and witnessing the administration’s failures across various sectors, it’s becoming increasingly clear that these issues are not just about policy but about the president’s ability to perform his duties effectively.

The Republican National Committee’s research division posted several videos that appeared to show President Biden in a “perpetual state of confusion.” One video from his recent speech in Normandy commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-Day showed Biden bending down, seemingly uncertain whether it was time to sit down.

Questions about Biden’s mental acuity also circulated last week after a bombshell report interviewed 45 lawmakers and administration officials about Biden’s mental performance.

Biden, 81, is the oldest person to hold the presidency and has faced skepticism from voters and Republican lawmakers about his ability to do his job. Many Republicans and even some Democrats said the president showed his age in private meetings.

Most of the people interviewed by the report who were critical of Biden’s performance were Republicans, although some Democrats acknowledged the president showed his age in several exchanges. These interviewees participated in meetings with Biden or were briefed on them contemporaneously, including administration officials and other Democrats who did not express concerns about how the president handled the meetings.

White House officials, however, dismissed many of these accounts, saying such criticisms were motivated by partisan politics.

The growing concern over Biden’s mental fitness is driving legislative efforts like the No Juicing Joe Act to ensure transparency and accountability in presidential health, highlighting the critical need for a capable and alert leader in the White House. The American people deserve a president who can effectively communicate and make sound decisions, and it is Congress’s duty to uphold this standard.

 

valhalla-ny-usa-may-10-2023

POLL: Is Biden cognitively fit for office?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

House Holds AG Garland in Contempt, Referred for Criminal Charges

washington-dc-usa-oct-26-2023

In a decisive move that upholds the rule of law, the House of Representatives voted to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress on Wednesday, referring the top Department of Justice (DOJ) official for criminal charges. This is a significant victory for those who believe in holding our leaders accountable and ensuring transparency in government.

The measure passed nearly along party lines in a 216 to 207 vote, with just one Republican, Rep. David Joyce of Ohio, betraying his party and his constituents. Joyce, a former prosecutor, argued against the resolution, claiming it would further politicize the judicial system. However, his lone dissent only highlights his failure to stand up for justice. It’s clear that Joyce must be voted out in November to restore true conservative leadership.

Garland’s refusal to turn over audio recordings of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Biden is a blatant obstruction of justice. These recordings are crucial for understanding Biden’s mishandling of classified documents and his mental state during the investigation. Hur concluded that no criminal charges were warranted, but described Biden as presenting himself “as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” This characterization raises serious concerns about Biden’s fitness for office and the potential leniency he received.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., led the charge, ensuring the contempt resolution passed. This action demonstrates the GOP’s unwavering commitment to transparency and accountability. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, voiced the frustration felt by many, stating, “There’s only one reason why the attorney general would do that. He doesn’t want us to hear it.”

This move is part of a broader effort by House Republicans to hold the Biden administration accountable. The pursuit of Hur’s audio tapes is just one aspect of the GOP’s wider impeachment inquiry into President Biden, investigating allegations that he used his political position to enrich himself and his family. Despite Biden’s denials of wrongdoing, the truth must come out.

The DOJ, however, is unlikely to act on this contempt referral, as indicated by past inaction on similar resolutions. This reality frustrates many Republicans, who see the DOJ as biased and unwilling to hold their own accountable. Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., expressed this sentiment, saying, “I’m not optimistic, because I think the DOJ has proven themselves very partisan and not honest brokers of how they apply the law.”

 

POLL: Should Merrick Garland be prosecuted by his own DOJ?

 

Continue Reading

Featured

The Dangers of Biden’s Weakness: Russian Ships off the Coast of Florida

rocket-launch-warship-start-antiship-missile

When it comes to national security, President Biden’s actions are not just weak—they’re downright reckless and dangerous. This week, a fleet of Russian warships brazenly entered Cuban waters, preparing for military drills in the Caribbean. This aggressive move is a direct threat to the United States, underscoring the dangerous consequences of Biden’s soft stance on national security.

Just this week, a fleet of Russian warships brazenly entered Cuban waters, preparing for military drills in the Caribbean. This aggressive move is a direct warning to President Biden, who recently approved Ukrainian forces to strike targets within Russia using U.S. weaponry. Strategic intelligence analyst Rebekah Koffler, author of “Putin’s Playbook,” interprets this deployment as a clear message from Russian President Vladimir Putin to Washington: “We can touch you.”

“Putin wants to be close to the U.S. homeland at this time when the Russia-Ukraine crisis is on a highly escalatory trajectory — given Biden’s authorization to Ukraine. If something goes wrong and Ukraine strikes critical targets in Russia close to major cities, the Russian military can enable the Cubans to strike targets inside the U.S. or strike U.S. interests,” Koffler explains.

Three Russian warships arrived at Havana Bay on Wednesday, greeted by a 21-cannon salute. Following them is a nuclear-powered submarine, the Kazan, which Russia claims is not carrying nuclear weapons. This is a chilling reminder of the dangers we face due to Biden’s misguided policies.

President Biden’s recent actions have only emboldened our enemies. His reckless approval for Ukraine to use American missiles against Russian targets has escalated tensions to a boiling point. Ukraine, struggling in its battle of attrition against Russian forces, has failed to secure major breakthroughs despite these counterattacks.

The presence of Russian warships in Cuba and Putin’s threats to supply weapons to U.S. neighbors are stark reminders of the perilous situation we are in. Putin’s recent suggestion that Russia may authorize strikes on the U.S. via proxy countries is a direct consequence of Biden’s weak leadership.

“Most of all, the warships are a reminder to Washington that it is unpleasant when an adversary meddles in your near abroad,” said Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America program at the Wilson Center. This situation underscores the need for strong, decisive leadership to protect our national security, something Biden has utterly failed to provide.

Putin’s rhetoric and actions highlight the precarious position we are in under Biden’s leadership. His statement last week about supplying weapons to regions that can strike sensitive U.S. facilities should alarm every American: “If [the U.S.] considers it possible to deliver such weapons to the combat zone to launch strikes on our territory and create problems for us, why don’t we have the right to supply weapons of the same type to some regions of the world where they can be used to launch strikes on sensitive facilities of the countries that do it to Russia?”

Adding to this dangerous mix, President Biden has also approved the notorious Azov Battalion to use U.S.-provided weaponry. This battalion, infamous for its neo-Nazi roots, has been a central figure in Russian propaganda against Ukraine’s government. Biden’s support for such a group not only undermines our moral standing but also hands Putin ammunition to justify his aggressive actions.

President Biden’s approval of Ukraine to use American missiles to strike Russia and his support for the controversial Azov Battalion reflects a dangerous softness on national security. These decisions have not only emboldened our adversaries but also jeopardized global stability. It’s time for a leader who prioritizes America’s safety and stands firm against threats to our homeland. Biden’s actions are not just a lapse in judgment—they are a direct threat to our nation’s security.

 

Biden Admin Threatens to Stop Weapon Supplies to Israel

POLL: Is Biden weak on foreign policy?

 

Continue Reading

Trending